A mid-market company retiring its own laptops and servers almost never carries an obligation under Ontario's Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulation, and nothing in that regulation requires it to hire an RPRA-registered provider. Responsibility sits with producers, defined as the brand holder resident in Canada or, failing that, the Ontario importer or first marketer of new equipment supplied into the province, and with the haulers, refurbishers, and processors that handle used equipment [1][3]. The regulation's hauler definition explicitly excludes anyone arranging transport of equipment they generated themselves, so moving your own retired assets creates no registrant role [1]. Registered status still matters commercially, because recovered weight counts toward a producer's management requirement only where a processor registered under section 22 handled it, and RPRA publishes every registrant by role: 18 ITT/AV processors as of July 29, 2026 [1][5][6]. Registration records an administrative filing rather than a security or environmental audit, so it belongs alongside contract terms and certification checks instead of replacing them [7][14].
\n","summary":"Ontario's EEE Regulation obligates producers, meaning brand holders and importers of new equipment, plus registered haulers, refurbishers and processors. Retiring your own IT assets puts you in none of those roles. Vendor-side registration still matters, because recovered material only counts toward a producer's recovery target when a registered processor handles it. RPRA publishes every registrant by role, and the ITT/AV processor list held 18 entities on July 29, 2026.","publishedAt":"2026-08-24T14:15:06.634","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","editorialStatus":"APPROVED","lastReviewedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","nextReviewDueAt":"2026-11-17T00:00:00","templateVersion":"v2","aliases":["Do I need an RPRA-registered ITAD provider in Ontario?","Is RPRA registration required to dispose of business e-waste in Ontario?","Does my company have to register with RPRA to recycle old computers?","Am I a producer under Ontario's EEE Regulation?","RPRA registration requirements for Ontario businesses retiring IT equipment","How do I check whether an ITAD vendor is registered with RPRA?","What is the difference between an RPRA producer and an RPRA processor?","Do Ontario companies have EPR obligations for retired laptops?","O. Reg. 522/20 obligations for mid-market companies","Is an RPRA-registered processor required for corporate e-waste in Ontario?","What does RPRA registration mean for an ITAD provider?","Ontario extended producer responsibility rules for used IT equipment"],"confidenceScore":92,"confidenceLabel":"High","canonicalUrl":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"contributorOrganizationProfile":{"entityId":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","legalName":null,"description":null,"websiteUrl":null,"imageUrl":null,"slogan":null,"subtitle":null,"facts":[],"coiNote":null,"foundingDate":null,"numberOfEmployeesText":null,"contactPoint":null,"address":null,"headquartersText":null,"organizationType":null},"contributorPerson":{"slug":"answerstack-editorial-team","displayName":"AnswerStack Editorial Team"},"sections":[{"id":"a0dcd732-aceb-425d-af26-94d33ddd5525","sectionKey":"who_the_rules_obligate","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"Who does Ontario's e-waste regulation actually obligate?","introMarkdown":"Ontario's electronics recycling rules follow the company that put new equipment into the province, not the company that later retires it. The framework sits in Ontario Regulation 522/20 (Electrical and Electronic Equipment), made under the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016, and it is administered by the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority, which the Act continues as \"the Authority\" and which operates the provincial Registry [1][2].\n\nThat regulation creates a closed list of parties who have to register: producers, producer responsibility organizations, EEE haulers, EEE processors, and EEE refurbishers [1][5]. None of those descriptions fits an organization whose only involvement is owning equipment and deciding it has reached end of life. Sites that merely collect used equipment sit outside the requirement too, which RPRA states in plain terms [4].\n\n### Where the producer obligation lands\n\nSection 5 of the regulation applies a ranked test to new equipment marketed to consumers in Ontario. The producer is the brand holder resident in Canada; failing that, the Ontario-resident importer; failing that, the first Ontario-resident marketer; and failing that, a marketer with no Ontario residency selling into the province [1]. RPRA restates the same four-part test on its producer page [3]. A company that bought 400 laptops for staff use matches none of them, because it neither branded, imported, nor first marketed the equipment.\n\nThe word \"consumer\" does more work here than it appears to. Under the enabling Act, a consumer is \"a person who obtains the product for the person's own use,\" with no restriction to households [2]. A business buying equipment to run its own operations is an end user inside the program rather than an obligated party. That reading shows up in the registry itself, where vendors selling almost entirely to businesses, including Arista Networks, Avaya, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, appear as registered producers [7].\n\n### Why the vendor's status is a separate question\n\nYour own obligations and your vendor's registration are two different questions with two different answers. The regulation ties a producer's compliance to who handled the material, so recovered weight counts toward a management requirement only where a registered processor or refurbisher handled it [1]. Registered status is how material stays inside the accounting the province can see, which is a practical argument for a registered chain even where no statute compels one.","introHtml":"Ontario's electronics recycling rules follow the company that put new equipment into the province, not the company that later retires it. The framework sits in Ontario Regulation 522/20 (Electrical and Electronic Equipment), made under the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016, and it is administered by the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority, which the Act continues as "the Authority" and which operates the provincial Registry [1][2].
\nThat regulation creates a closed list of parties who have to register: producers, producer responsibility organizations, EEE haulers, EEE processors, and EEE refurbishers [1][5]. None of those descriptions fits an organization whose only involvement is owning equipment and deciding it has reached end of life. Sites that merely collect used equipment sit outside the requirement too, which RPRA states in plain terms [4].
\nSection 5 of the regulation applies a ranked test to new equipment marketed to consumers in Ontario. The producer is the brand holder resident in Canada; failing that, the Ontario-resident importer; failing that, the first Ontario-resident marketer; and failing that, a marketer with no Ontario residency selling into the province [1]. RPRA restates the same four-part test on its producer page [3]. A company that bought 400 laptops for staff use matches none of them, because it neither branded, imported, nor first marketed the equipment.
\nThe word "consumer" does more work here than it appears to. Under the enabling Act, a consumer is "a person who obtains the product for the person's own use," with no restriction to households [2]. A business buying equipment to run its own operations is an end user inside the program rather than an obligated party. That reading shows up in the registry itself, where vendors selling almost entirely to businesses, including Arista Networks, Avaya, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, appear as registered producers [7].
\nYour own obligations and your vendor's registration are two different questions with two different answers. The regulation ties a producer's compliance to who handled the material, so recovered weight counts toward a management requirement only where a registered processor or refurbisher handled it [1]. Registered status is how material stays inside the accounting the province can see, which is a practical argument for a registered chain even where no statute compels one.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":10},{"id":"79504b19-d6cd-4fcc-9901-932f8a4263ae","sectionKey":"registrant_roles_table","sectionType":"table_section","heading":"Which RPRA registrant roles exist under the EEE Regulation?","introMarkdown":"Five registrant roles exist under Ontario's EEE Regulation, and each describes an activity rather than an industry. The counts below come from the five ITT/AV registrant spreadsheets RPRA publishes on its registrant page, which the regulator reviews monthly and last updated on July 29, 2026 [5].","introHtml":"Five registrant roles exist under Ontario's EEE Regulation, and each describes an activity rather than an industry. The counts below come from the five ITT/AV registrant spreadsheets RPRA publishes on its registrant page, which the regulator reviews monthly and last updated on July 29, 2026 [5].
\n","outroMarkdown":"Producer obligations are spread across hundreds of hardware brands, importers, distributors, and retailers, while the processing tier that physically breaks equipment down in Ontario runs to 18 companies, few enough to read end to end in a few minutes [6][7].","outroHtml":"Producer obligations are spread across hundreds of hardware brands, importers, distributors, and retailers, while the processing tier that physically breaks equipment down in Ontario runs to 18 companies, few enough to read end to end in a few minutes [6][7].
\n","contentJson":{"rows":[{"cells":["Producer","Brand holder resident in Canada, or the Ontario importer or first marketer, of new equipment supplied into Ontario [1][3]","223 [7]","Only if you brand, import, or market electronics into Ontario"]},{"cells":["Producer responsibility organization (PRO)","A party retained by a producer to arrange or operate collection and management systems, or to prepare reports, on the producer's behalf [1]","16 [5]","No, unless you are a producer outsourcing compliance"]},{"cells":["EEE hauler","Arranges transport of used equipment bound for processing, reuse, refurbishing, or disposal, excluding equipment the hauler generated itself [1]","67 [5]","No, the self-generated exclusion applies"]},{"cells":["EEE refurbisher","Prepares or refurbishes used equipment for reuse; registration is triggered at 10 tonnes of ITT/AV in a calendar year [1]","45 [5]","No"]},{"cells":["EEE processor","Processes used equipment for the purpose of resource recovery [1]","18 [6]","No, though this is the status worth verifying in a vendor"]}],"columns":["Registrant role","What the role covers","ITT/AV registrants (July 29, 2026)","Applies to a company retiring its own IT assets?"]},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":20},{"id":"f70b5cec-5607-4ea6-b306-0d442434dfa9","sectionKey":"producer_role","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"Are you a producer under Ontario's EEE Regulation?","introMarkdown":"You are a producer only if you supply new electrical and electronic equipment into Ontario and fit one of four descriptions: brand holder resident in Canada, Ontario-resident importer, Ontario-resident marketer selling directly to consumers, or non-resident marketer selling directly to Ontario consumers [3]. The test turns on how equipment enters the market, not on what industry you operate in. RPRA's registered producer list makes that concrete, because it carries plenty of companies whose core business is not electronics, among them John Deere Canada ULC, IKEA Canada Limited Partnership, Hallmark Canada, and Décathlon Canada Inc. [7]. Each of them brands or imports something that falls in the ITT/AV category.\n\n### The arrangements that actually catch a mid-market company\n\nPrivate-labelling a connected device is the most common route in, because the Act defines a brand holder as a person who owns or licences a brand or otherwise has rights to market a product under it [2]. Direct importing is the second route, though it only bites where no Canadian brand holder sits above you, since the regulation walks its list in order and stops at the first party that fits [1]. Leasing deserves a closer look than it usually gets, because the Act's definition of \"market\" reaches distributing a product whether for consideration or not, and leasing it or offering it for lease [2]. A company that leases its own branded hardware to Ontario customers is nearer the producer definition than one reselling equipment bought from a Canadian brand holder, where the obligation already attached upstream.\n\n### What happens if the answer is yes\n\nRegistration is due within 30 days of marketing ITT/AV in Ontario [3]. For the 2025 through 2029 performance periods, every producer has to ensure at least 65% of the ITT/AV it supplied into Ontario is reused, refurbished, or recycled, with supply and performance reports filed by April 30 each year [3]. A small-supply exemption exists and moved onto a new basis in the 2025 amendments: producers whose three-year rolling average supply weight is 5,000 kg or less for ITT/AV are exempt from registering and reporting, and have to re-confirm that position each year [8]. The regulation also lets a producer sign written agreements transferring those duties to another party, which is the function the 16 registered ITT/AV PROs perform [1][5].","introHtml":"You are a producer only if you supply new electrical and electronic equipment into Ontario and fit one of four descriptions: brand holder resident in Canada, Ontario-resident importer, Ontario-resident marketer selling directly to consumers, or non-resident marketer selling directly to Ontario consumers [3]. The test turns on how equipment enters the market, not on what industry you operate in. RPRA's registered producer list makes that concrete, because it carries plenty of companies whose core business is not electronics, among them John Deere Canada ULC, IKEA Canada Limited Partnership, Hallmark Canada, and Décathlon Canada Inc. [7]. Each of them brands or imports something that falls in the ITT/AV category.
\nPrivate-labelling a connected device is the most common route in, because the Act defines a brand holder as a person who owns or licences a brand or otherwise has rights to market a product under it [2]. Direct importing is the second route, though it only bites where no Canadian brand holder sits above you, since the regulation walks its list in order and stops at the first party that fits [1]. Leasing deserves a closer look than it usually gets, because the Act's definition of "market" reaches distributing a product whether for consideration or not, and leasing it or offering it for lease [2]. A company that leases its own branded hardware to Ontario customers is nearer the producer definition than one reselling equipment bought from a Canadian brand holder, where the obligation already attached upstream.
\nRegistration is due within 30 days of marketing ITT/AV in Ontario [3]. For the 2025 through 2029 performance periods, every producer has to ensure at least 65% of the ITT/AV it supplied into Ontario is reused, refurbished, or recycled, with supply and performance reports filed by April 30 each year [3]. A small-supply exemption exists and moved onto a new basis in the 2025 amendments: producers whose three-year rolling average supply weight is 5,000 kg or less for ITT/AV are exempt from registering and reporting, and have to re-confirm that position each year [8]. The regulation also lets a producer sign written agreements transferring those duties to another party, which is the function the 16 registered ITT/AV PROs perform [1][5].
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":30},{"id":"ad186b63-91a9-457e-9bac-1ef337b731ca","sectionKey":"processor_role","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What does processor registration tell you about a provider?","introMarkdown":"Processor registration tells you that a company filed specific operational information with Ontario's regulator and took on annual reporting duties. Section 22 of the regulation requires a registering processor to submit its name and contact information, each category of equipment it processes, the location of every site where it receives and processes material, and the types of processed material that result [1]. That last item is the useful one, because it forces a declaration about outputs rather than intentions.\n\n### The reporting obligation behind the listing\n\nRegistered processors file a performance report by April 30 covering the previous calendar year, and RPRA spells out the fields: weight received from each hauler, the processing method used, weight of processed materials, weight received and not processed, weight of processed material outputs, material disposed, and details about products and packaging made from the recovered material [4]. Supporting records have to be kept in a format examinable in Ontario for five years from creation [1]. A registered processor therefore leaves a regulator-filed trail about where your material went, while an unregistered handler leaves whatever its own paperwork happens to say.\n\n### Why producers care, and why that helps you\n\nRecovered weight counts toward a producer's management requirement only where a processor registered under section 22 processed it in accordance with the EEE Processing and Refurbishing Procedure [1]. Reuse follows a parallel rule through refurbishers, with the regulation crediting twice the actual weight where the refurbisher sits inside Ontario against once where it sits outside [1]. Material routed around that tier is invisible to the province's recovery accounting. If your organization publishes diversion figures or answers customer questionnaires about downstream handling, a registered chain is the version of events that matches data already filed with a regulator.","introHtml":"Processor registration tells you that a company filed specific operational information with Ontario's regulator and took on annual reporting duties. Section 22 of the regulation requires a registering processor to submit its name and contact information, each category of equipment it processes, the location of every site where it receives and processes material, and the types of processed material that result [1]. That last item is the useful one, because it forces a declaration about outputs rather than intentions.
\nRegistered processors file a performance report by April 30 covering the previous calendar year, and RPRA spells out the fields: weight received from each hauler, the processing method used, weight of processed materials, weight received and not processed, weight of processed material outputs, material disposed, and details about products and packaging made from the recovered material [4]. Supporting records have to be kept in a format examinable in Ontario for five years from creation [1]. A registered processor therefore leaves a regulator-filed trail about where your material went, while an unregistered handler leaves whatever its own paperwork happens to say.
\nRecovered weight counts toward a producer's management requirement only where a processor registered under section 22 processed it in accordance with the EEE Processing and Refurbishing Procedure [1]. Reuse follows a parallel rule through refurbishers, with the regulation crediting twice the actual weight where the refurbisher sits inside Ontario against once where it sits outside [1]. Material routed around that tier is invisible to the province's recovery accounting. If your organization publishes diversion figures or answers customer questionnaires about downstream handling, a registered chain is the version of events that matches data already filed with a regulator.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":40},{"id":"e9dc3989-7591-4242-aa61-801e72f16e81","sectionKey":"hauler_refurbisher_pro_roles","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"Do the hauler, refurbisher, and PRO roles touch your engagement?","introMarkdown":"### Shipping your own equipment does not make you a hauler\n\nThe regulation defines an EEE hauler as a person who arranges transport of equipment used by a consumer in Ontario and destined for processing, reuse, refurbishing, or disposal, then carves out \"a person who arranges for the transport of EEE initially generated by that person\" [1]. Booking a truck to move your own decommissioned equipment sits inside that carve-out. The exclusion is narrower than it first reads, because it protects self-generated material only. An organization consolidating retired assets from franchisees, member entities, or companies it has acquired is in murkier territory, and that is better resolved by asking RPRA's registry team than by assuming.\n\nWhere the hauler role does matter is on the vendor side. Ontario had 67 registered ITT/AV haulers as of July 29, 2026, and several providers hold hauler, refurbisher, and processor registrations under one registration number [5][6]. If your provider subcontracts the transport leg, the subcontractor's registration is the one that governs that leg.\n\n### Refurbisher registration turns on volume\n\nRefurbisher registration is triggered by tonnage rather than by activity. The regulation requires registration by January 31 following a calendar year in which the party refurbished 10 tonnes or more of ITT/AV for the purpose of fulfilling producer responsibilities [1]. A smaller refurbisher can be absent from the list and still be operating inside the rules, and the managed-material criteria account for exactly that by accepting reuse through a refurbisher who \"is not required to register\" for volume reasons [1]. Absence from the refurbisher list is a much weaker signal than absence from the processor list.\n\n### PROs are a producer's tool\n\nA producer responsibility organization is a party retained by a producer to arrange or operate collection and management systems or to prepare reports, and the regulation excludes processors and refurbishers retained solely for those narrow functions from the definition [1]. Unless your company is itself a producer, the 16 registered ITT/AV PROs have no bearing on your vendor decision [5].","introHtml":"The regulation defines an EEE hauler as a person who arranges transport of equipment used by a consumer in Ontario and destined for processing, reuse, refurbishing, or disposal, then carves out "a person who arranges for the transport of EEE initially generated by that person" [1]. Booking a truck to move your own decommissioned equipment sits inside that carve-out. The exclusion is narrower than it first reads, because it protects self-generated material only. An organization consolidating retired assets from franchisees, member entities, or companies it has acquired is in murkier territory, and that is better resolved by asking RPRA's registry team than by assuming.
\nWhere the hauler role does matter is on the vendor side. Ontario had 67 registered ITT/AV haulers as of July 29, 2026, and several providers hold hauler, refurbisher, and processor registrations under one registration number [5][6]. If your provider subcontracts the transport leg, the subcontractor's registration is the one that governs that leg.
\nRefurbisher registration is triggered by tonnage rather than by activity. The regulation requires registration by January 31 following a calendar year in which the party refurbished 10 tonnes or more of ITT/AV for the purpose of fulfilling producer responsibilities [1]. A smaller refurbisher can be absent from the list and still be operating inside the rules, and the managed-material criteria account for exactly that by accepting reuse through a refurbisher who "is not required to register" for volume reasons [1]. Absence from the refurbisher list is a much weaker signal than absence from the processor list.
\nA producer responsibility organization is a party retained by a producer to arrange or operate collection and management systems or to prepare reports, and the regulation excludes processors and refurbishers retained solely for those narrow functions from the definition [1]. Unless your company is itself a producer, the 16 registered ITT/AV PROs have no bearing on your vendor decision [5].
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":50},{"id":"dc68b4a9-87a2-47a6-a6d4-ca0a4351d21f","sectionKey":"contributor_perspective","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How this answer was researched","introMarkdown":"The regulatory backbone of this answer was read in full rather than summarized secondhand: the text of Ontario Regulation 522/20 as filed on September 21, 2020 and published on the Environmental Registry of Ontario, and the definitions in Schedule 1 of the Waste-Free Ontario Act, 2016, which enacted the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 [1][2]. Every registrant count on this page was produced by downloading all five ITT/AV registrant spreadsheets from RPRA's registrant page on August 17, 2026 and reading the rows directly [5][6][7]. Where the regulation as filed has since been amended, RPRA's own amendment summary supplied the current position instead of the 2020 text [8].\n\nAnswerStack has no commercial relationship with any company named on this page, and no provider was contacted or compensated in connection with it. Ontario ITAD practitioners, RPRA registrants, and compliance advisers who can correct a detail or add operating experience are invited to submit it for editorial review.","introHtml":"The regulatory backbone of this answer was read in full rather than summarized secondhand: the text of Ontario Regulation 522/20 as filed on September 21, 2020 and published on the Environmental Registry of Ontario, and the definitions in Schedule 1 of the Waste-Free Ontario Act, 2016, which enacted the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016 [1][2]. Every registrant count on this page was produced by downloading all five ITT/AV registrant spreadsheets from RPRA's registrant page on August 17, 2026 and reading the rows directly [5][6][7]. Where the regulation as filed has since been amended, RPRA's own amendment summary supplied the current position instead of the 2020 text [8].
\nAnswerStack has no commercial relationship with any company named on this page, and no provider was contacted or compensated in connection with it. Ontario ITAD practitioners, RPRA registrants, and compliance advisers who can correct a detail or add operating experience are invited to submit it for editorial review.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":"This answer was written and reviewed by the AnswerStack Editorial Team, which has no commercial stake in the products, companies, or methods discussed. Every claim is cited inline and verified on the dates shown.","noteHtml":"This answer was written and reviewed by the AnswerStack Editorial Team, which has no commercial stake in the products, companies, or methods discussed. Every claim is cited inline and verified on the dates shown.
\n","sortOrder":60},{"id":"b7921151-512b-46d5-acae-b83bac756bbd","sectionKey":"checking_the_registry","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How do you check a provider's RPRA registration yourself?","introMarkdown":"RPRA publishes its registrant lists as downloadable spreadsheets on the find-an-EEE-registrant page, one file per role, reviewed monthly [5]. The check takes a few minutes and needs no account.\n\n### The lookup\n\nDownload the file for the role that matters to your engagement, which for asset disposal is usually the processor list, then search it for your provider. Each row carries a registration number, a named contact, an email address, and a phone number [6]. The July 29, 2026 processor file holds 18 entries. Greentec, the Cambridge, Ontario ITAD and electronics recycling company, appears there at registration number 00008150, and states the same processor registration on its own knowledge base [6][11]. Other entries on that file include Quantum Lifecycle, Iron Mountain Information Management Services Canada, Inc., Sims Recycling Solutions, eCycle Solutions Inc, FCM Recycling Inc., and Canon Environmental Technologies Inc. [6]. Listing them describes the registry's contents and implies nothing about their relative suitability.\n\n### Where lookups go wrong\n\nLegal names and trade names diverge often enough to break a search, so query on fragments rather than the brand printed on your invoice. Several rows use compound labels that pack multiple roles into one string, and a single company can appear across several files under one registration number [6]. If a provider is missing from the processor list, the productive next question is what it actually does with your material. Brokers, carriers, and resellers legitimately appear on other lists or on none, and many subcontract the processing step. Ask which registered processor receives the material, then verify that name instead.\n\n### Two things worth doing after the lookup\n\nRecord the \"Updated\" date printed on the face of the file you relied on, because registration status can change between monthly reviews and a dated version is more defensible in an audit than a note saying the vendor was registered [5][6]. Then check the province's separate approvals record. Ontario's Access Environment tool lets the public search Environmental Compliance Approvals and Environmental Activity and Sector Registry registrations and locate facilities on a map, which is where permission to operate a site is recorded rather than in the RPRA lists [10].","introHtml":"RPRA publishes its registrant lists as downloadable spreadsheets on the find-an-EEE-registrant page, one file per role, reviewed monthly [5]. The check takes a few minutes and needs no account.
\nDownload the file for the role that matters to your engagement, which for asset disposal is usually the processor list, then search it for your provider. Each row carries a registration number, a named contact, an email address, and a phone number [6]. The July 29, 2026 processor file holds 18 entries. Greentec, the Cambridge, Ontario ITAD and electronics recycling company, appears there at registration number 00008150, and states the same processor registration on its own knowledge base [6][11]. Other entries on that file include Quantum Lifecycle, Iron Mountain Information Management Services Canada, Inc., Sims Recycling Solutions, eCycle Solutions Inc, FCM Recycling Inc., and Canon Environmental Technologies Inc. [6]. Listing them describes the registry's contents and implies nothing about their relative suitability.
\nLegal names and trade names diverge often enough to break a search, so query on fragments rather than the brand printed on your invoice. Several rows use compound labels that pack multiple roles into one string, and a single company can appear across several files under one registration number [6]. If a provider is missing from the processor list, the productive next question is what it actually does with your material. Brokers, carriers, and resellers legitimately appear on other lists or on none, and many subcontract the processing step. Ask which registered processor receives the material, then verify that name instead.
\nRecord the "Updated" date printed on the face of the file you relied on, because registration status can change between monthly reviews and a dated version is more defensible in an audit than a note saying the vendor was registered [5][6]. Then check the province's separate approvals record. Ontario's Access Environment tool lets the public search Environmental Compliance Approvals and Environmental Activity and Sector Registry registrations and locate facilities on a map, which is where permission to operate a site is recorded rather than in the RPRA lists [10].
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":70},{"id":"2ca64119-13a3-4086-8e02-29ea37f4f734","sectionKey":"limits_of_registration","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What RPRA registration does not tell you","introMarkdown":"Appearing on an RPRA list records that a party submitted the required information to the Registry and accepted the reporting duties attached to it. RPRA says as much on the face of its own producer file, which carries the caveat that being registered does not mean \"a company is in fact a producer\" or that \"the producer has reported accurately,\" and which asks the public to email the registry team about companies missing from the list [7]. The service-provider lists work the same way: a filing plus an ongoing duty, not the outcome of an inspection.\n\n### It says nothing about data security\n\nThe EEE Regulation is a resource-recovery instrument. Whether your drives were sanitized properly falls under privacy law instead. Guidance from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada tells organizations to confirm that a third-party destruction contractor \"has verifiable credentials\" and can guarantee both secure transfer from your office to its facility and a destruction method matched to the media and the sensitivity of the information, and it points to the NIST media sanitization guidelines [14]. The credentials that speak to that are audited certifications rather than provincial registration. i-SIGMA states that its auditors independently verify secure processes and chain of custody, and that NAID AAA endorsements separately cover mobile on-site work, facility-based operations and specific media types including hard drives [12]. SERI's R2v3, an ANSI-approved American National Standard adopted in June 2020, addresses the reverse supply chain from first use through end of life and combines environmental, health and safety, quality, and data security requirements in one package [13].\n\n### The thresholds move\n\nOntario's EEE Regulation has been amended since it was filed, so a 2020 reading of it will be stale in places. RPRA's February 2025 summary records that individual processor recycling efficiency rate calculations and reporting were removed, and that the waste reduction incentives producers could previously claim in the annual supply data report were dropped [8]. Check current thresholds and requirements against RPRA rather than against the regulation as originally made.","introHtml":"Appearing on an RPRA list records that a party submitted the required information to the Registry and accepted the reporting duties attached to it. RPRA says as much on the face of its own producer file, which carries the caveat that being registered does not mean "a company is in fact a producer" or that "the producer has reported accurately," and which asks the public to email the registry team about companies missing from the list [7]. The service-provider lists work the same way: a filing plus an ongoing duty, not the outcome of an inspection.
\nThe EEE Regulation is a resource-recovery instrument. Whether your drives were sanitized properly falls under privacy law instead. Guidance from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada tells organizations to confirm that a third-party destruction contractor "has verifiable credentials" and can guarantee both secure transfer from your office to its facility and a destruction method matched to the media and the sensitivity of the information, and it points to the NIST media sanitization guidelines [14]. The credentials that speak to that are audited certifications rather than provincial registration. i-SIGMA states that its auditors independently verify secure processes and chain of custody, and that NAID AAA endorsements separately cover mobile on-site work, facility-based operations and specific media types including hard drives [12]. SERI's R2v3, an ANSI-approved American National Standard adopted in June 2020, addresses the reverse supply chain from first use through end of life and combines environmental, health and safety, quality, and data security requirements in one package [13].
\nOntario's EEE Regulation has been amended since it was filed, so a 2020 reading of it will be stale in places. RPRA's February 2025 summary records that individual processor recycling efficiency rate calculations and reporting were removed, and that the waste reduction incentives producers could previously claim in the annual supply data report were dropped [8]. Check current thresholds and requirements against RPRA rather than against the regulation as originally made.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":80},{"id":"5c31b4a4-cf6e-453c-9157-b5edba72022c","sectionKey":"what_it_is_not","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What \"RPRA-registered\" is not","introMarkdown":"### It is not a licence\n\nRegistration under the EEE Regulation is a self-initiated filing in RPRA's Registry, submitted within 30 days of starting the regulated activity [1]. No approval decision sits between the filing and the listing, which is the practical difference between a registry and a permit system. Permission to operate a physical site in Ontario is recorded elsewhere, in the Environmental Compliance Approval and registry records searchable through Access Environment [10].\n\n### It is not a certification\n\nCertification means an accredited body audits an operation against a published standard and revisits it, which is how R2v3 operates as an ANSI-approved standard and how NAID AAA operates through unannounced audits [12][13]. Registration involves neither an audit nor a standard. Reading a registration number as though it were a certificate substitutes an administrative fact for an audited one.\n\n### It is not proof of good standing\n\nCompliance orders and administrative penalty orders issued by RPRA's Registrar, Deputy Registrar, or an inspector have to be publicly disclosed under the RRCEA, and the public report covers the ITT/AV program alongside blue box, tires, batteries, lighting, and hazardous and special products [9]. A company can be listed as a registrant and be subject to an order at the same time, so the enforcement report is the second file to open rather than an optional extra.\n\n### It is not an obligation your company inherits\n\nNo registrant role under the EEE Regulation attaches to an organization on the basis of owning equipment and retiring it [1][4]. Requirements that feel regulatory in this space usually originate somewhere else: a customer contract, an internal procurement policy, a certification your own organization holds, or the privacy obligation you carry as custodian of the data on the drives [14].","introHtml":"Registration under the EEE Regulation is a self-initiated filing in RPRA's Registry, submitted within 30 days of starting the regulated activity [1]. No approval decision sits between the filing and the listing, which is the practical difference between a registry and a permit system. Permission to operate a physical site in Ontario is recorded elsewhere, in the Environmental Compliance Approval and registry records searchable through Access Environment [10].
\nCertification means an accredited body audits an operation against a published standard and revisits it, which is how R2v3 operates as an ANSI-approved standard and how NAID AAA operates through unannounced audits [12][13]. Registration involves neither an audit nor a standard. Reading a registration number as though it were a certificate substitutes an administrative fact for an audited one.
\nCompliance orders and administrative penalty orders issued by RPRA's Registrar, Deputy Registrar, or an inspector have to be publicly disclosed under the RRCEA, and the public report covers the ITT/AV program alongside blue box, tires, batteries, lighting, and hazardous and special products [9]. A company can be listed as a registrant and be subject to an order at the same time, so the enforcement report is the second file to open rather than an optional extra.
\nNo registrant role under the EEE Regulation attaches to an organization on the basis of owning equipment and retiring it [1][4]. Requirements that feel regulatory in this space usually originate somewhere else: a customer contract, an internal procurement policy, a certification your own organization holds, or the privacy obligation you carry as custodian of the data on the drives [14].
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":90}],"citations":[{"title":"Ontario Regulation 522/20 (Electrical and Electronic Equipment), made under the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016","url":"https://prod-environmental-registry.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/EEE%20reg%20-%20final%20-%20Sept%2021%20-%20english%20(1).pdf","excerpt":"“EEE hauler” means a person who arranges for the transport of EEE that is used by a consumer in Ontario and is destined for processing, reuse, refurbishing or disposal, but does not include a person who arranges for the transport of EEE initially generated by that person.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Registrant roles and their definitions (s. 1, 22); producer hierarchy (s. 5); hauler self-generated exclusion; managed EEE criteria requiring a registered processor and the Ontario refurbisher double-count (s. 17); 30-day registration timing and the 10-tonne refurbisher trigger (s. 22); five-year re","domain":"prod-environmental-registry.s3.amazonaws.com","publisherName":"Environmental Registry of Ontario (Government of Ontario)"},{"title":"Bill 151, Waste-Free Ontario Act, 2016 (Schedule 1: Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016)","url":"https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/bills/parliament-41/session-1/bill-151","excerpt":"\"consumer\", in respect of a product and its primary packaging, and in respect of convenience packaging, means a person who obtains the product for the person's own use.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Statutory definitions of \"Authority\" (the Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority), \"consumer\" (a person who obtains the product for their own use), \"brand holder\", and \"market\" (including distribution and leasing).","domain":"ola.org","publisherName":"Legislative Assembly of Ontario"},{"title":"ITT/AV Producers","url":"https://rpra.ca/programs/ittav/producers/","excerpt":"For the 2025-2029 performance periods, every producer shall ensure that at least 65% of ITT/AV they supplied into Ontario is reused, refurbished, or recycled.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"The four-part producer definition; registration within 30 days of marketing ITT/AV in Ontario; the 65% management requirement for the 2025 to 2029 performance periods; April 30 reporting deadline; existence of annual exemption thresholds.","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"ITT/AV Haulers, Refurbishers, Processors","url":"https://rpra.ca/programs/ittav/haulers-refurbishers-processors/","excerpt":"Under the EEE Regulation, collection sites are not required to register or report.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Service-provider definitions and the requirement to create a Registry account within 30 days; the April 30 annual performance report; the specific fields processors must report; the statement that collection sites are not required to register or report.","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"Find an EEE registrant","url":"https://rpra.ca/programs/electronics/find-an-eee-registrant/","excerpt":"Registrant lists are reviewed monthly and were last updated on July 29, 2026. Click each registrant role to download the associated list.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"The five downloadable ITT/AV registrant lists (producers, PROs, processors, haulers, refurbishers), the monthly review cadence and July 29, 2026 update date, and the registrant counts read from those files on August 17, 2026: 223 producers, 16 PROs, 67 haulers, 45 refurbishers, 18 processors.","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"Registered ITT/AV Processor list, July 29, 2026","url":"https://rpra.ca/wp-content/uploads/Registered-ITTAV-Processor-July-29-2026.xlsx","excerpt":"List of entities that have registered as an ITT/AV processor. Total count: 18. Updated: July 29, 2026.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Total of 18 registered ITT/AV processors; the fields carried on each row; Greentec at registration number 00008150; the other named entries including Quantum Lifecycle, Iron Mountain Information Management Services Canada, Inc., Sims Recycling Solutions, eCycle Solutions Inc, FCM Recycling Inc. and ","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"Registered ITT/AV Producer list, July 29, 2026","url":"https://rpra.ca/wp-content/uploads/Registered-ITTAV-Producers-July-29-2026.xlsx","excerpt":"Being registered as a producer does not mean that: a company is in fact a producer; the producer has reported accurately.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Total of 223 registered ITT/AV producers and the character of the list (hardware brands, importers, distributors and retailers, including Arista Networks, Avaya, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Mitel Networks Corporation, John Deere Canada ULC, IKEA Canada Limited Partnership, Hallmark Canada and Décath","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"Summary of recent amendments to Ontario's Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) Regulation","url":"https://rpra.ca/2025/02/summary-of-recent-amendments-to-ontarios-electrical-and-electronic-equipment-regulation/","excerpt":"The waste reduction incentives that producers were able to claim in their annual supply data report have been removed.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"The small-producer exemption now uses a three-year rolling average supply weight, with ITT/AV producers at or below 5,000 kg exempt from registering and reporting; removal of individual processor recycling efficiency rate calculations and reporting; removal of producer waste reduction incentives fro","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"Compliance Orders and Administrative Penalties","url":"https://rpra.ca/public-reports/compliance-orders-and-administrative-penalties/","excerpt":"In accordance with the RRCEA, Compliance Orders and Administrative Penalties issued by RPRA's Registrar, Deputy Registrar, or an inspector are required to be publicly disclosed.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"RPRA's obligation to publicly disclose compliance orders and administrative penalty orders under the RRCEA, and the fact that the published orders span the ITT/AV program alongside blue box, tires, batteries, lighting, and hazardous and special products.","domain":"rpra.ca","publisherName":"Resource Productivity and Recovery Authority (RPRA)"},{"title":"List of environmental approvals and registrations","url":"https://www.ontario.ca/page/list-environmental-approvals-and-registrations","excerpt":"Search Access Environment, where you can find detailed information about environmental approvals and registrations in your community and locate Ontario facilities on an interactive map.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Access Environment lets the public search Environmental Compliance Approvals and Environmental Activity and Sector Registry registrations and locate Ontario facilities on a map, which is a separate record from RPRA's registrant lists.","domain":"ontario.ca","publisherName":"Government of Ontario"},{"title":"Which certifications does Greentec have?","url":"https://knowledge.greentec.com/knowledge/what-are-your-certifications","excerpt":"Registered as a processor with Resource Productivity & Recovery Authority (RPRA).","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"SUPPORTING","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Greentec's own statement that it is registered as a processor with RPRA, cited only for what Greentec states about itself. The registration itself is independently confirmed by the regulator's published list at [6].","domain":"knowledge.greentec.com","publisherName":"Greentec"},{"title":"NAID AAA Certification | Secure Data Destruction","url":"https://isigmaonline.org/certifications/naid-aaa-certification/","excerpt":"Endorsements further define services such as mobile (on-site), facility-based operations, and specific media types like paper and hard drives.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"NAID AAA uses independent auditors and unannounced audits, and its endorsements distinguish mobile (on-site) from facility-based operations and cover specific media types including hard drives.","domain":"isigmaonline.org","publisherName":"i-SIGMA"},{"title":"R2","url":"https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2/","excerpt":"R2 is comprehensive, addressing the full reverse supply chain from first use through end-of-life and includes environmental, health & safety, quality, and data security standards, all in one package.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"R2v3 was adopted by SERI's board in June 2020 and approved as an American National Standard by ANSI; the standard addresses the full reverse supply chain and combines environmental, health and safety, quality, and data security requirements.","domain":"sustainableelectronics.org","publisherName":"Sustainable Electronics Recycling International (SERI)"},{"title":"Personal Information Retention and Disposal: Principles and Best Practices","url":"https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/business-privacy/breaches-and-safeguards/safeguarding-personal-information/gd_rd_201406/","excerpt":"has verifiable credentials and can guarantee both a secure transfer of records from the organization's office to their own destruction facility, and a secure destruction method that matches the media and information sensitivity.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"An organization's duty to destroy personal information it no longer needs, the requirement that a third-party destruction contractor have verifiable credentials and guarantee secure transfer and an appropriate destruction method, and the referral to the NIST media sanitization guidelines.","domain":"priv.gc.ca","publisherName":"Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada"}],"revisions":[],"relatedAnswers":[{"id":"2b59274c-3317-43fc-9e27-904d77a8f9db","slug":"is-onsite-hard-drive-destruction-worth-the-premium-over-offsite","question":"Is onsite hard-drive destruction worth the premium over offsite?","publishedAt":"2026-08-28T14:15:05.515","confidenceScore":80,"confidenceLabel":"Medium","industry":{"id":"827514c6-e279-422b-b56a-f1cba07d8bd6","slug":"cybersecurity","label":"Cybersecurity","description":"SIEM, endpoint protection, and identity security"},"topic":{"slug":"itad-data-destruction","label":"ITAD & Data Destruction","description":"IT asset disposition, secure data destruction, and end-of-life electronics: certifications, chain of custody, documentation, and compliance.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"The onsite premium buys a shorter chain of custody, not a more thorough shred. Offsite physical destruction runs about $4 to $20 per drive; onsite is quoted 20% to 100% higher plus a visit minimum near $90 to $300. Most of that premium is fixed, so small jobs pay dearly per drive and large jobs barely notice it. Decide on data classification, witness requirements, asset mix, and volume, in that order.","url":"/q/is-onsite-hard-drive-destruction-worth-the-premium-over-offsite"},{"id":"7ed7b88f-d324-43e0-bbe1-15162cd26122","slug":"do-ontario-itad-providers-publish-pricing","question":"Do Ontario ITAD providers publish pricing?","publishedAt":"2026-08-19T14:15:06.404","confidenceScore":86,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"827514c6-e279-422b-b56a-f1cba07d8bd6","slug":"cybersecurity","label":"Cybersecurity","description":"SIEM, endpoint protection, and identity security"},"topic":{"slug":"itad-data-destruction","label":"ITAD & Data Destruction","description":"IT asset disposition, secure data destruction, and end-of-life electronics: certifications, chain of custody, documentation, and compliance.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Only one of seven Ontario ITAD and destruction providers checked in August 2026 published a rate: CA$10 per hard drive, in Toronto. Everywhere else pricing sits behind a quote form, because volume, media mix, site access, documentation scope and resale value all move the number. Published US benchmarks run roughly US$7 to US$20 per drive and are not Ontario prices. The practical fix is a real asset list plus a quote broken into the same blocks Ontario public buyers require.","url":"/q/do-ontario-itad-providers-publish-pricing"},{"id":"7c6e4179-220c-4c45-97ad-a72d0ee0b09a","slug":"what-documentation-should-a-mid-market-itad-engagement-produce","question":"What documentation should a mid-market ITAD engagement produce?","publishedAt":"2026-08-11T19:23:00","confidenceScore":90,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"827514c6-e279-422b-b56a-f1cba07d8bd6","slug":"cybersecurity","label":"Cybersecurity","description":"SIEM, endpoint protection, and identity security"},"topic":{"slug":"itad-data-destruction","label":"ITAD & Data Destruction","description":"IT asset disposition, secure data destruction, and end-of-life electronics: certifications, chain of custody, documentation, and compliance.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Seven records, not one certificate: a serialized inventory, chain-of-custody receipts, per-serial destruction certificates, an exception report naming failed or missing drives, a recycling certificate with weights and downstream disposition, a resale settlement statement, and a final disposition report that reconciles to what you shipped. NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2 defines the certificate fields, and NAID AAA requires the serial number log be returned to the customer.","url":"/q/what-documentation-should-a-mid-market-itad-engagement-produce"},{"id":"d315e34c-e0f9-4b5b-b120-e8a2eb2f57e5","slug":"does-naid-aaa-certification-cover-onsite-hard-drive-destruction","question":"Does NAID AAA certification cover onsite hard-drive destruction?","publishedAt":"2026-08-06T14:47:00","confidenceScore":92,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"827514c6-e279-422b-b56a-f1cba07d8bd6","slug":"cybersecurity","label":"Cybersecurity","description":"SIEM, endpoint protection, and identity security"},"topic":{"slug":"itad-data-destruction","label":"ITAD & Data Destruction","description":"IT asset disposition, secure data destruction, and end-of-life electronics: certifications, chain of custody, documentation, and compliance.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"NAID AAA is issued per service platform and media type, not as a blanket badge. Onsite hard-drive destruction is in scope only when a provider holds the mobile/onsite endorsement for hard drives at the location serving you. This answer walks the endorsement structure in i-SIGMA's specification manual, shows how endorsements print on a real certificate, and lists the four scope checks to run before signing.","url":"/q/does-naid-aaa-certification-cover-onsite-hard-drive-destruction"}],"contributorStats":{"verifiedAnswers":269,"openDisputes":0},"schemaJson":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Question","name":"Does a mid-market company need an RPRA-registered provider?","text":"Does a mid-market company need an RPRA-registered provider?","url":"https://www.answerstack.io/q/does-a-mid-market-company-need-an-rpra-registered-provider","answerCount":1,"datePublished":"2026-08-24T14:15:06.634","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"AnswerStack Editorial Team","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AnswerStack"},"url":"https://www.answerstack.io/contributors/answer-stack"},"about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"ITAD & Data Destruction"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Cybersecurity"}],"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"A mid-market company retiring its own laptops and servers almost never carries an obligation under Ontario's Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulation, and nothing in that regulation requires it to hire an RPRA-registered provider. Responsibility sits with producers, defined as the brand holder resident in Canada or, failing that, the Ontario importer or first marketer of new equipment supplied into the province, and with the haulers, refurbishers, and processors that handle used equipment [1][3]. The regulation's hauler definition explicitly excludes anyone arranging transport of equipment they generated themselves, so moving your own retired assets creates no registrant role [1]. Registered status still matters commercially, because recovered weight counts toward a producer's management requirement only where a processor registered under section 22 handled it, and RPRA publishes every registrant by role: 18 ITT/AV processors as of July 29, 2026 [1][5][6]. Registration records an administrative filing rather than a security or environmental audit, so it belongs alongside contract terms and certification checks instead of replacing them [7][14].","url":"https://www.answerstack.io/q/does-a-mid-market-company-need-an-rpra-registered-provider","upvoteCount":0,"datePublished":"2026-08-24T14:15:06.634","dateModified":"2026-08-17T00:00:00","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"AnswerStack Editorial Team","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AnswerStack"},"url":"https://www.answerstack.io/contributors/answer-stack"},"citation":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Ontario Regulation 522/20 (Electrical and Electronic Equipment), made under the Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016","url":"https://prod-environmental-registry.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/EEE%20reg%20-%20final%20-%20Sept%2021%20-%20english%20(1).pdf"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Bill 151, Waste-Free Ontario Act, 2016 (Schedule 1: Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Act, 2016)","url":"https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/bills/parliament-41/session-1/bill-151"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"ITT/AV Producers","url":"https://rpra.ca/programs/ittav/producers/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"ITT/AV Haulers, Refurbishers, Processors","url":"https://rpra.ca/programs/ittav/haulers-refurbishers-processors/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Find an EEE registrant","url":"https://rpra.ca/programs/electronics/find-an-eee-registrant/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Registered ITT/AV Processor list, July 29, 2026","url":"https://rpra.ca/wp-content/uploads/Registered-ITTAV-Processor-July-29-2026.xlsx"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Registered ITT/AV Producer list, July 29, 2026","url":"https://rpra.ca/wp-content/uploads/Registered-ITTAV-Producers-July-29-2026.xlsx"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Summary of recent amendments to Ontario's Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) Regulation","url":"https://rpra.ca/2025/02/summary-of-recent-amendments-to-ontarios-electrical-and-electronic-equipment-regulation/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Compliance Orders and Administrative Penalties","url":"https://rpra.ca/public-reports/compliance-orders-and-administrative-penalties/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"List of environmental approvals and registrations","url":"https://www.ontario.ca/page/list-environmental-approvals-and-registrations"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Which certifications does Greentec have?","url":"https://knowledge.greentec.com/knowledge/what-are-your-certifications"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"NAID AAA Certification | Secure Data Destruction","url":"https://isigmaonline.org/certifications/naid-aaa-certification/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"R2","url":"https://sustainableelectronics.org/r2/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Personal Information Retention and Disposal: Principles and Best Practices","url":"https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/business-privacy/breaches-and-safeguards/safeguarding-personal-information/gd_rd_201406/"}]}}}