Recruiting software and applicant tracking systems (ATS) span a wide price range, from free plans up to more than $125,000 per year, with most small and mid-sized employers landing between roughly $250 and $15,000 per year depending on company size and features.[11] Published entry pricing runs from about $15 per user per month for a lightweight tool like Manatal to $299 per month for headcount-based plans from Workable, while dedicated flat tiers such as JazzHR start near $1,000 per year.[2][1][4] Pricing follows five main models: per employee per month, per recruiter or seat, per active job slot, a flat monthly or annual tier, and a custom enterprise quote.[10][11] Many mid-market and enterprise platforms, including Greenhouse and Lever, publish no prices and quote each buyer on company size, hiring volume, and feature depth, so aggregated buyer data puts a typical Greenhouse contract near $26,600 per year.[6][7][12] The subscription usually excludes implementation, job board and sponsored postings, assessments, background checks, and integrations, which can add materially to the first-year total.[10]
\n","summary":"ATS pricing runs from free to more than $125,000 a year and follows five models: per employee, per recruiter seat, per active job slot, a flat tier, or a custom enterprise quote. Small teams often pay $250 to $3,000 a year; mid-market runs $3,000 to $15,000. Some vendors publish prices (Manatal, Workable, JazzHR, Breezy, Zoho, Ashby's entry tier); others quote only (Greenhouse, Lever). Budget for implementation, job ads, assessments, and integrations on top of the subscription.","publishedAt":"2026-07-18T15:44:04.351","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","editorialStatus":"APPROVED","lastReviewedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","nextReviewDueAt":"2026-10-17T00:00:00","templateVersion":"v2","aliases":["How much does an ATS cost?","Applicant tracking system pricing","Recruiting software cost per month","ATS pricing models explained","How much is recruiting software?","Cost of an applicant tracking system","ATS cost per user vs per employee","Recruiting software pricing 2026","How much does Workable or Greenhouse cost?","ATS subscription price ranges","Per recruiter vs per employee ATS pricing","Hiring software cost for small business"],"confidenceScore":88,"confidenceLabel":"High","canonicalUrl":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"contributorOrganizationProfile":{"entityId":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","legalName":null,"description":null,"websiteUrl":null,"imageUrl":null,"slogan":null,"subtitle":null,"facts":[],"coiNote":null,"foundingDate":null,"numberOfEmployeesText":null,"contactPoint":null,"address":null,"headquartersText":null,"organizationType":null},"contributorPerson":{"slug":"answerstack-editorial-team","displayName":"AnswerStack Editorial Team"},"sections":[{"id":"b0982f31-6bf4-4b8d-8070-2f3d43ca1a45","sectionKey":"overall_cost","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What does recruiting software actually cost?","introMarkdown":"Recruiting software costs anywhere from nothing to well over $125,000 a year, and where you land depends mostly on your company size, your hiring volume, and how many premium features you turn on.[11][10] Independent buying guides give a rough map by size: small businesses under 100 employees at roughly $250 to $3,000 a year, mid-sized companies of 100 to 500 employees at about $3,000 to $15,000, larger organizations of 500 to 5,000 at $15,000 to $50,000 or more, and enterprises above 5,000 employees beyond $125,000.[11] Those bands are wide because two companies of the same size can pay very different amounts once add-on modules, contract length, and negotiation come into play.\n\n### What you can actually see published\n\nA useful first split is between vendors that publish prices and vendors that quote only. Tools aimed at small and mid-sized teams tend to post real numbers: Manatal starts at $15 per user per month billed annually, Workable's headcount-based plans start at $299 a month on the Standard tier, Breezy HR runs from a free single-position plan up to $439 a month, and JazzHR's entry Hero plan is $1,000 a year.[2][1][3][4] Zoho Recruit publishes a per-recruiter price and keeps a permanent free tier for a single active job.[9] Enterprise-oriented platforms such as Greenhouse and Lever publish no prices at all and route every buyer through a sales quote.[6][7]\n\n### Why the range is so wide\n\nThe spread comes from the pricing model itself, not only the vendor. A per-employee plan bills you for your whole workforce whether or not those people ever open the software, so a 300-person company on a $10-per-employee HR suite pays about $3,000 a month before it posts a single job.[10] A per-seat tool bills only the recruiters who log in, which is cheaper for a lean talent team hiring at volume. Job-slot pricing ties the bill to how many roles are open at once, which suits seasonal or low-volume hiring. Because these models measure completely different things, comparing two ATS products on headline price alone rarely tells you which will cost less for your situation.","introHtml":"Recruiting software costs anywhere from nothing to well over $125,000 a year, and where you land depends mostly on your company size, your hiring volume, and how many premium features you turn on.[11][10] Independent buying guides give a rough map by size: small businesses under 100 employees at roughly $250 to $3,000 a year, mid-sized companies of 100 to 500 employees at about $3,000 to $15,000, larger organizations of 500 to 5,000 at $15,000 to $50,000 or more, and enterprises above 5,000 employees beyond $125,000.[11] Those bands are wide because two companies of the same size can pay very different amounts once add-on modules, contract length, and negotiation come into play.
\nA useful first split is between vendors that publish prices and vendors that quote only. Tools aimed at small and mid-sized teams tend to post real numbers: Manatal starts at $15 per user per month billed annually, Workable's headcount-based plans start at $299 a month on the Standard tier, Breezy HR runs from a free single-position plan up to $439 a month, and JazzHR's entry Hero plan is $1,000 a year.[2][1][3][4] Zoho Recruit publishes a per-recruiter price and keeps a permanent free tier for a single active job.[9] Enterprise-oriented platforms such as Greenhouse and Lever publish no prices at all and route every buyer through a sales quote.[6][7]
\nThe spread comes from the pricing model itself, not only the vendor. A per-employee plan bills you for your whole workforce whether or not those people ever open the software, so a 300-person company on a $10-per-employee HR suite pays about $3,000 a month before it posts a single job.[10] A per-seat tool bills only the recruiters who log in, which is cheaper for a lean talent team hiring at volume. Job-slot pricing ties the bill to how many roles are open at once, which suits seasonal or low-volume hiring. Because these models measure completely different things, comparing two ATS products on headline price alone rarely tells you which will cost less for your situation.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":10},{"id":"47964992-fed0-450a-9e81-d3cd2b442260","sectionKey":"models_table","sectionType":"table_section","heading":"Which ATS pricing models exist?","introMarkdown":"Five pricing models cover almost every recruiting tool on the market, and each one measures a different thing. The ranges below are published typical figures, not floors or ceilings.","introHtml":"Five pricing models cover almost every recruiting tool on the market, and each one measures a different thing. The ranges below are published typical figures, not floors or ceilings.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{"rows":[{"cells":["Per employee per month","On your total headcount, not just recruiters","About $5 to $15 per employee per month [10]","HR suites where the ATS is one module of many [8]"]},{"cells":["Per recruiter or seat","On each active recruiter or hiring user","About $60 to $150 per seat; lighter tools $15 to $25 [10][9]","Dedicated talent teams hiring at volume"]},{"cells":["Per active job slot","On how many roles are open at once","About $50 to $150 per open job per month [10]","Seasonal or low-volume hiring"]},{"cells":["Flat monthly or annual tier","One price for the whole account, often with usage caps","About $99 to $600 per month [10][1]","Small teams that want a predictable bill"]},{"cells":["Enterprise custom quote","On company size, hiring volume, features, and negotiation","Roughly $15,000 to $125,000+ per year [11][12]","Large or complex hiring operations"]}],"columns":["Pricing model","How you are billed","Typical published range","Best fit"]},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":20},{"id":"c7d52eed-6588-4e35-ae7b-4eef10c18d1e","sectionKey":"models_explained","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How does each pricing model work, and what should you watch?","introMarkdown":"Each model shifts cost in a predictable direction, so the useful question is which one matches how your team actually hires.\n\n### Per employee per month\n\nPer-employee pricing charges for your entire workforce every month, typically $5 to $15 per head, which is how bundled HR platforms fold the ATS into a wider suite.[10] BambooHR follows this pattern: applicant tracking is included in its plans, billed per employee per month with volume discounts and a flat monthly floor for very small teams.[8] The rate per head is low and the bill is easy to forecast, but it scales with hiring and non-hiring staff alike, so a growing company can watch its recruiting cost rise even in a quarter when it makes no hires. Check the per-employee rate as your headcount crosses the vendor's discount thresholds.\n\n### Per recruiter or seat\n\nSeat-based pricing charges only for the people doing the hiring, usually $60 to $150 per recruiter per month at the professional end and as little as $15 to $25 for lighter tools.[10][9] It rewards a small talent team running many requisitions, since ten open roles cost the same as two. The risk runs the other way: if hiring managers, coordinators, and interviewers all need their own logins, seat counts and the bill climb faster than expected. Confirm which roles require a paid seat before you compare quotes.\n\n### Per active job slot\n\nJob-slot pricing ties the bill to the number of roles open at once, commonly $50 to $150 per active posting per month.[10] It fits organizations that hire in bursts, because you can open slots during a push and close them afterward. The trade-off is unpredictability if hiring volume spikes, and some vendors keep a slot billable until you formally archive the role, so pipeline housekeeping affects the invoice.\n\n### Flat monthly or annual tier\n\nA flat tier gives you one price for the whole account, often with caps on active jobs or users, which is why Workable, Breezy HR, and JazzHR all sell defined plans rather than per-seat math.[1][3][4] Predictability is the appeal, since you know the number before you sign. The item to check is the cap, because exceeding an active-job or user limit usually pushes you to the next tier or triggers overage charges.\n\n### Enterprise custom quote\n\nCustom quotes apply to most mid-market and enterprise platforms, where Greenhouse, Lever, and similar vendors price on company size, hiring volume, feature tier, and how hard you negotiate.[6][7] Aggregated buyer data shows the effect: across 865 tracked Greenhouse purchases the median contract was about $26,600 a year, ranging from roughly $10,200 to $75,200.[12] Expect an annual commitment, a formal procurement cycle, and real room to negotiate, especially on multi-year terms.","introHtml":"Each model shifts cost in a predictable direction, so the useful question is which one matches how your team actually hires.
\nPer-employee pricing charges for your entire workforce every month, typically $5 to $15 per head, which is how bundled HR platforms fold the ATS into a wider suite.[10] BambooHR follows this pattern: applicant tracking is included in its plans, billed per employee per month with volume discounts and a flat monthly floor for very small teams.[8] The rate per head is low and the bill is easy to forecast, but it scales with hiring and non-hiring staff alike, so a growing company can watch its recruiting cost rise even in a quarter when it makes no hires. Check the per-employee rate as your headcount crosses the vendor's discount thresholds.
\nSeat-based pricing charges only for the people doing the hiring, usually $60 to $150 per recruiter per month at the professional end and as little as $15 to $25 for lighter tools.[10][9] It rewards a small talent team running many requisitions, since ten open roles cost the same as two. The risk runs the other way: if hiring managers, coordinators, and interviewers all need their own logins, seat counts and the bill climb faster than expected. Confirm which roles require a paid seat before you compare quotes.
\nJob-slot pricing ties the bill to the number of roles open at once, commonly $50 to $150 per active posting per month.[10] It fits organizations that hire in bursts, because you can open slots during a push and close them afterward. The trade-off is unpredictability if hiring volume spikes, and some vendors keep a slot billable until you formally archive the role, so pipeline housekeeping affects the invoice.
\nA flat tier gives you one price for the whole account, often with caps on active jobs or users, which is why Workable, Breezy HR, and JazzHR all sell defined plans rather than per-seat math.[1][3][4] Predictability is the appeal, since you know the number before you sign. The item to check is the cap, because exceeding an active-job or user limit usually pushes you to the next tier or triggers overage charges.
\nCustom quotes apply to most mid-market and enterprise platforms, where Greenhouse, Lever, and similar vendors price on company size, hiring volume, feature tier, and how hard you negotiate.[6][7] Aggregated buyer data shows the effect: across 865 tracked Greenhouse purchases the median contract was about $26,600 a year, ranging from roughly $10,200 to $75,200.[12] Expect an annual commitment, a formal procurement cycle, and real room to negotiate, especially on multi-year terms.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":30},{"id":"3dbf6d53-b653-4744-84ed-7b50dc2ddc07","sectionKey":"products_table","sectionType":"table_section","heading":"What do named ATS products charge?","introMarkdown":"The published prices below were confirmed live on each vendor's own pricing page on July 17, 2026. Quote-only vendors are marked as such rather than assigned a guessed number.","introHtml":"The published prices below were confirmed live on each vendor's own pricing page on July 17, 2026. Quote-only vendors are marked as such rather than assigned a guessed number.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{"rows":[{"cells":["Manatal","$15 per user per month, billed annually [2]","Per recruiter seat","Public"]},{"cells":["Zoho Recruit","$25 per recruiter per month annually; free tier for 1 job [9][13]","Per recruiter seat","Public"]},{"cells":["Breezy HR","Free for 1 position; paid from $157 per month annually [3]","Flat per account","Public"]},{"cells":["Workable","$299 per month Standard for 1 to 20 employees [1]","Per employee headcount tier","Public"]},{"cells":["JazzHR","$1,000 per year Hero plan [4]","Flat tier","Public"]},{"cells":["Ashby","$400 per month Foundations, up to 100 employees [5]","Company-size tier","Public entry, quote above"]},{"cells":["BambooHR","Per employee per month; ATS bundled in HR suite [8]","Per employee","Public model, quote for rate"]},{"cells":["Greenhouse","Not published; about $26,600 per year median contract [6][12]","Custom by plan, volume, features","Quote only"]},{"cells":["Lever","Not published; tailored to org size and hiring needs [7]","Custom quote","Quote only"]},{"cells":["Recruitee","Not published; tiered by plan, headcount, billing period [14]","Flat tier by plan","Quote or demo"]}],"columns":["Product","Published entry price","Pricing model","Public or quote"]},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":40},{"id":"7fd23e59-3798-4a7a-aa3b-f098a9136786","sectionKey":"sticker_excludes","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What does the sticker price not include?","introMarkdown":"The subscription covers the software license, not the work of getting it running or the services that plug into it.\n\n### Implementation and data migration\n\nSetup, configuration, and migrating candidate records from a legacy system are frequently quoted separately, and independent guides flag implementation as a cost that can rival the subscription itself.[10] On enterprise platforms this is usually a distinct line in the quote rather than a bundled inclusion, so ask whether onboarding is included, capped, or billed by scope before you sign.\n\n### Job boards and sponsored postings\n\nPosting to premium job boards or promoting a listing usually costs extra on top of the ATS, because the software distributes the ad but does not pay for the placement.[10] Sponsored posts on the major boards are billed per job or per click by the board, not by the ATS vendor. Budget for this separately if paid distribution is part of how you source.\n\n### Assessments, video, and texting\n\nSkills assessments, one-way video interviews, and candidate texting are often sold as paid add-ons rather than core features. Workable charges separately on its Standard plan for texting at $89 a month, video interviews at $109, and assessments at $59, then includes them in its higher tiers.[1] If these matter to your process, price the tier that bundles them against the base tier plus the add-ons you would buy.\n\n### Background checks and integrations\n\nBackground and reference checks are billed per candidate or per check, typically through a third-party provider the ATS integrates with, so the cost sits outside the subscription.[10] Deeper integrations, API access, and single sign-on can also sit behind higher tiers or separate fees. Zoho Recruit, for example, meters extras such as a client portal and video interviews per license on top of the base seat price.[13]\n\n### AI features and credits\n\nAI sourcing, matching, and assistant features increasingly run on a credit or usage meter rather than a flat inclusion. Workable bundles a block of free AI credits with every plan, then sells more at roughly $0.10 to $0.12 per credit.[1] If you plan to rely on AI screening at volume, model the credit burn, because it can grow into a recurring line item of its own.","introHtml":"The subscription covers the software license, not the work of getting it running or the services that plug into it.
\nSetup, configuration, and migrating candidate records from a legacy system are frequently quoted separately, and independent guides flag implementation as a cost that can rival the subscription itself.[10] On enterprise platforms this is usually a distinct line in the quote rather than a bundled inclusion, so ask whether onboarding is included, capped, or billed by scope before you sign.
\nPosting to premium job boards or promoting a listing usually costs extra on top of the ATS, because the software distributes the ad but does not pay for the placement.[10] Sponsored posts on the major boards are billed per job or per click by the board, not by the ATS vendor. Budget for this separately if paid distribution is part of how you source.
\nSkills assessments, one-way video interviews, and candidate texting are often sold as paid add-ons rather than core features. Workable charges separately on its Standard plan for texting at $89 a month, video interviews at $109, and assessments at $59, then includes them in its higher tiers.[1] If these matter to your process, price the tier that bundles them against the base tier plus the add-ons you would buy.
\nBackground and reference checks are billed per candidate or per check, typically through a third-party provider the ATS integrates with, so the cost sits outside the subscription.[10] Deeper integrations, API access, and single sign-on can also sit behind higher tiers or separate fees. Zoho Recruit, for example, meters extras such as a client portal and video interviews per license on top of the base seat price.[13]
\nAI sourcing, matching, and assistant features increasingly run on a credit or usage meter rather than a flat inclusion. Workable bundles a block of free AI credits with every plan, then sells more at roughly $0.10 to $0.12 per credit.[1] If you plan to rely on AI screening at volume, model the credit burn, because it can grow into a recurring line item of its own.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":50},{"id":"61e28843-c16a-4fe2-90fc-3177bc02a60a","sectionKey":"hidden_costs","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What hidden costs should you watch before signing?","introMarkdown":"The costs that surprise buyers usually come from how the contract scales over time rather than from the headline price.\n\n### Renewal increases\n\nAnnual price increases at renewal are a common line item that independent buying guides list among the costs to plan for, so a rate that looks reasonable in year one can drift above budget by year three.[10] Ask for a capped renewal uplift in writing before you commit to a multi-year deal, since your room to negotiate is widest before the first signature.\n\n### The billing metric itself\n\nWhether you are billed per employee or per seat changes the math as you grow, and the two can diverge sharply. Workable and BambooHR both bill on total company headcount, so your recruiting cost rises with company size even when your hiring team stays the same.[1][8] A per-seat tool such as Manatal or Zoho Recruit holds steady as headcount grows but climbs if more users need access.[2][9] Map your likely three-year growth against the metric before you commit.\n\n### Add-ons that inflate the bill\n\nPer-license extras stack up quietly. Independent analysis of Zoho Recruit found that add-ons such as a client portal and video interviews can push a real invoice well above the sticker seat price, in one worked example roughly 46 percent higher than the base rate.[13] Add every module you actually need to the quote before comparing vendors, because the base price alone understates most real deployments.\n\n### Minimum terms and caps\n\nMost published plans assume an annual commitment for the advertised rate, and monthly billing typically costs more. Recruitee, for instance, sets its rate by plan, headcount, and billing period, with a discount for paying annually.[14] Usage caps on active jobs, candidates, or storage can also trigger a jump to the next tier, so check the ceilings against your peak hiring rather than your average.","introHtml":"The costs that surprise buyers usually come from how the contract scales over time rather than from the headline price.
\nAnnual price increases at renewal are a common line item that independent buying guides list among the costs to plan for, so a rate that looks reasonable in year one can drift above budget by year three.[10] Ask for a capped renewal uplift in writing before you commit to a multi-year deal, since your room to negotiate is widest before the first signature.
\nWhether you are billed per employee or per seat changes the math as you grow, and the two can diverge sharply. Workable and BambooHR both bill on total company headcount, so your recruiting cost rises with company size even when your hiring team stays the same.[1][8] A per-seat tool such as Manatal or Zoho Recruit holds steady as headcount grows but climbs if more users need access.[2][9] Map your likely three-year growth against the metric before you commit.
\nPer-license extras stack up quietly. Independent analysis of Zoho Recruit found that add-ons such as a client portal and video interviews can push a real invoice well above the sticker seat price, in one worked example roughly 46 percent higher than the base rate.[13] Add every module you actually need to the quote before comparing vendors, because the base price alone understates most real deployments.
\nMost published plans assume an annual commitment for the advertised rate, and monthly billing typically costs more. Recruitee, for instance, sets its rate by plan, headcount, and billing period, with a discount for paying annually.[14] Usage caps on active jobs, candidates, or storage can also trigger a jump to the next tier, so check the ceilings against your peak hiring rather than your average.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":60},{"id":"83faf31e-eb44-4dbb-be03-6b42a153ba8f","sectionKey":"estimate_budget","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How can you estimate your own budget?","introMarkdown":"Start by counting three numbers: your total employees, your active recruiters, and your typical number of open roles at one time.\n\nThose figures tell you which pricing model will treat you most kindly. If you have a large workforce but a small hiring team, a per-seat tool usually beats a per-employee HR suite, because you pay for the handful of people actually recruiting rather than for the whole company.[10] If you already run a bundled HR platform, adding its built-in ATS on a per-employee basis can be cheaper than buying a standalone system, since applicant tracking comes as one module of a suite you already fund.[8]\n\nTeam size then points to a tier. For a small team hiring occasionally, a published flat or per-seat plan keeps the bill predictable and low, with options like Manatal near $15 per user, Zoho Recruit near $25 per recruiter, or Breezy HR from a free single-role plan sitting at the affordable end.[2][9][3] A mid-sized company hiring steadily tends to land on a defined tier from a vendor such as Workable or JazzHR, or a per-employee HR suite, in the low thousands of dollars per year.[1][4][11] A larger or more complex operation should plan for a custom enterprise quote from Greenhouse, Lever, or a comparable platform, and should budget implementation and add-ons on top of the license from the start.[6][7][12]\n\nWhatever the model, ask each vendor for an all-in first-year figure that includes setup, the modules you need, and expected job-board spend, so you are comparing total cost of ownership instead of the advertised entry price.[10]","introHtml":"Start by counting three numbers: your total employees, your active recruiters, and your typical number of open roles at one time.
\nThose figures tell you which pricing model will treat you most kindly. If you have a large workforce but a small hiring team, a per-seat tool usually beats a per-employee HR suite, because you pay for the handful of people actually recruiting rather than for the whole company.[10] If you already run a bundled HR platform, adding its built-in ATS on a per-employee basis can be cheaper than buying a standalone system, since applicant tracking comes as one module of a suite you already fund.[8]
\nTeam size then points to a tier. For a small team hiring occasionally, a published flat or per-seat plan keeps the bill predictable and low, with options like Manatal near $15 per user, Zoho Recruit near $25 per recruiter, or Breezy HR from a free single-role plan sitting at the affordable end.[2][9][3] A mid-sized company hiring steadily tends to land on a defined tier from a vendor such as Workable or JazzHR, or a per-employee HR suite, in the low thousands of dollars per year.[1][4][11] A larger or more complex operation should plan for a custom enterprise quote from Greenhouse, Lever, or a comparable platform, and should budget implementation and add-ons on top of the license from the start.[6][7][12]
\nWhatever the model, ask each vendor for an all-in first-year figure that includes setup, the modules you need, and expected job-board spend, so you are comparing total cost of ownership instead of the advertised entry price.[10]
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":70},{"id":"5f8a66b0-059e-4f75-9932-37f485c8268e","sectionKey":"contributor_perspective","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How this answer was researched","introMarkdown":"Every price in this answer was checked directly on the vendor's own pricing page on July 17, 2026, and corroborated with independent buying guides and aggregated buyer data wherever a vendor publishes no public rate. Software pricing in this category changes often: vendors revise tiers, rename plans, move features between tiers, and adjust per-seat and per-employee rates without much notice, so treat every figure here as a verified snapshot rather than a permanent quote. Quote-only vendors were confirmed as quote-only rather than assigned a guessed number, and the ranges for those come from independent transaction data. This record has no commercial stake in any product named. If you work in HR or talent acquisition and your real invoices differ from these figures, or if you represent a vendor whose pricing has changed, you are invited to submit a correction with a dated source so the record stays accurate for the next reader.","introHtml":"Every price in this answer was checked directly on the vendor's own pricing page on July 17, 2026, and corroborated with independent buying guides and aggregated buyer data wherever a vendor publishes no public rate. Software pricing in this category changes often: vendors revise tiers, rename plans, move features between tiers, and adjust per-seat and per-employee rates without much notice, so treat every figure here as a verified snapshot rather than a permanent quote. Quote-only vendors were confirmed as quote-only rather than assigned a guessed number, and the ranges for those come from independent transaction data. This record has no commercial stake in any product named. If you work in HR or talent acquisition and your real invoices differ from these figures, or if you represent a vendor whose pricing has changed, you are invited to submit a correction with a dated source so the record stays accurate for the next reader.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":"This answer was written and reviewed by the AnswerStack Editorial Team, which has no commercial stake in the products, companies, or methods discussed. Every claim is cited inline and verified on the dates shown.","noteHtml":"This answer was written and reviewed by the AnswerStack Editorial Team, which has no commercial stake in the products, companies, or methods discussed. Every claim is cited inline and verified on the dates shown.
\n","sortOrder":80}],"citations":[{"title":"Workable Pricing: Plans and Add-ons","url":"https://www.workable.com/pricing","excerpt":"Standard $299/month; Premier $599/month; Enterprise $719/month. Pricing based on company headcount. Texting+ $89/mo, Video interviews+ $109/mo, Assessments+ $59/mo.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Standard $299/mo, Premier $599/mo, Enterprise $719/mo billed on company headcount; add-ons texting $89, video $109, assessments $59; AI credit pricing $0.10 to $0.12","domain":"workable.com","publisherName":"Workable"},{"title":"Manatal Pricing","url":"https://www.manatal.com/pricing","excerpt":"Professional $15/user/month; Enterprise $35/user/month; Enterprise Plus $55/user/month (annual billing).","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Professional $15/user/mo annual ($19 monthly), Enterprise $35, Enterprise Plus $55, Custom quote; per recruiter seat model","domain":"manatal.com","publisherName":"Manatal"},{"title":"Breezy HR Pricing","url":"https://breezy.hr/pricing","excerpt":"Bootstrap free (1 active position); Startup $157/mo; Growth $273/mo; Business $439/mo, billed annually.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Free Bootstrap plan for 1 position; Startup $157/mo, Growth $273/mo, Business $439/mo billed annually; flat per-account pricing with unlimited users","domain":"breezy.hr","publisherName":"Breezy HR"},{"title":"JazzHR Pricing","url":"https://www.jazzhr.com/pricing/","excerpt":"Hero $1,000/yr; Plus $3,480/yr; Pro $5,508/yr, billed annually.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Hero $1,000/yr, Plus $3,480/yr, Pro $5,508/yr; flat tier billed annually","domain":"jazzhr.com","publisherName":"JazzHR"},{"title":"Ashby Pricing","url":"https://www.ashbyhq.com/pricing","excerpt":"Foundations $400/month for startups up to 100 employees; Plus and Enterprise pricing based on company size and usage.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Foundations plan $400/mo for up to 100 employees with 10% annual discount; Plus and Enterprise tiers quoted by company size","domain":"ashbyhq.com","publisherName":"Ashby"},{"title":"Greenhouse Pricing","url":"https://www.greenhouse.com/pricing","excerpt":"Greenhouse pricing is customized based on your company's hiring needs, influenced by plan, hiring volume, and complexity.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Quote-only; Core, Plus, Pro tiers priced by plan, hiring volume, organizational complexity, and features","domain":"greenhouse.com","publisherName":"Greenhouse"},{"title":"Lever Pricing","url":"https://www.lever.co/pricing/","excerpt":"Pricing available upon request, tailored based on your organization's size and hiring needs.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Quote-only; pricing tailored to organization size and hiring needs, available on request","domain":"lever.co","publisherName":"Lever"},{"title":"BambooHR Pricing","url":"https://www.bamboohr.com/pricing","excerpt":"Pay per employee, per month. Automatic volume discounts. Hiring and onboarding (ATS) included in plans.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Per-employee-per-month model with automatic volume discounts and a flat monthly floor for small teams; applicant tracking included in the HR platform plans","domain":"bamboohr.com","publisherName":"BambooHR"},{"title":"Zoho Recruit Pricing","url":"https://www.zoho.com/recruit/pricing.html","excerpt":"Forever Free plan (1 active job). Standard and Enterprise priced per recruiter license; annual billing saves up to 16%.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Per-recruiter license model; Forever Free tier for 1 active job; active-job limits 1 (Free), 10 (Standard), 20 (Enterprise); annual billing saves up to 16%","domain":"zoho.com","publisherName":"Zoho"},{"title":"Applicant Tracking Software Pricing Models","url":"https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/applicant-tracking-software-pricing-models/","excerpt":"Per user: entry avg ~$70, mid ~$140, high ~$335. Flat rate: entry avg ~$136, mid ~$255, high ~$372. Implementation, training, and migration are separate costs.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Per-user averages ~$70/$140/$335; flat-rate averages ~$136/$255/$372; per-employee $5 to $15; implementation, training, migration, background checks as separate costs","domain":"softwareadvice.com","publisherName":"Software Advice"},{"title":"Applicant Tracking System Pricing Guide","url":"https://www.selectsoftwarereviews.com/blog/ats-pricing-short-guide","excerpt":"Small business (<100): $250 to $3,000/yr. Medium (100 to 500): $3,000 to $15,000. Large (500 to 5,000): $15,000 to $50,000+. Enterprise (5,000+): beyond $125,000.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Small business under 100 employees $250 to $3,000/yr; mid-market $3,000 to $15,000; large $15,000 to $50,000+; enterprise beyond $125,000; models flat, per user, per vacancy, per module","domain":"selectsoftwarereviews.com","publisherName":"SelectSoftware Reviews"},{"title":"Greenhouse Software Pricing and Plans","url":"https://www.vendr.com/marketplace/greenhouse","excerpt":"Median buyer pays $26,634 per year based on 865 purchases; range from $10,211 to $75,188 annually.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Median Greenhouse buyer pays about $26,634/yr across 865 tracked purchases; range roughly $10,211 to $75,188","domain":"vendr.com","publisherName":"Vendr"},{"title":"Zoho Recruit Pricing 2026","url":"https://www.pin.com/blog/zoho-recruit-pricing/","excerpt":"Standard $25/user/month; Enterprise $50/user/month (annual). Add-ons (client portal $6/license, video $12/license) push a three-person team to $109.60/month versus $75 base.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Corporate HR Standard $25/user/mo, Enterprise $50 (annual); Staffing Agency Standard $25, Professional $50, Enterprise $75; add-ons client portal $6/license and video $12/license can push a real bill about 46% above sticker","domain":"pin.com","publisherName":"Pin"},{"title":"Recruitee Pricing","url":"https://recruitee.com/pricing","excerpt":"Subscriptions are tiered based on the plan, the number of employees, and billing period. Paying annually gives a 20% discount.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","supportsText":"Tiered plans (Start, Advance, Optimize) priced by plan, number of employees, and billing period; 20% discount for annual billing; one-year minimum; exact figures by quote or demo","domain":"recruitee.com","publisherName":"Recruitee (Tellent)"}],"revisions":[],"relatedAnswers":[{"id":"16031afa-f1b4-48f0-a1d5-02aee75c7ab0","slug":"applicant-tracking-system-worth-it-or-can-i-hire","question":"Is an applicant tracking system worth it, or can I hire without one?","publishedAt":"2026-07-21T20:47:06.493","confidenceScore":88,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"e1a1da3c-52a8-4e99-88ad-d08ef17d7c3f","slug":"hr-technology","label":"HR Technology","description":"ATS, HRIS, payroll, and workforce management"},"topic":{"slug":"recruiting-applicant-tracking","label":"Recruiting & Applicant Tracking","description":"ATS, Recruiting CRM, Recruitment Marketing & Sourcing, Resume Parsing, Interview Scheduling, Video Interviewing","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Manual hiring out of an inbox and a spreadsheet is viable for roughly one to five openings a year with a single decision maker. It gets expensive once applicant counts climb, several interviewers need the same view, or you have to reproduce dated hiring records.","url":"/q/applicant-tracking-system-worth-it-or-can-i-hire"},{"id":"0121c7a2-3ec2-4c62-8508-3f2193d94ef4","slug":"recruiting-stack-integrate-ats-crm-interview-scheduling-and-job","question":"Does the recruiting stack integrate: ATS, CRM, interview scheduling, and job boards?","publishedAt":"2026-07-21T20:47:04.008","confidenceScore":88,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"e1a1da3c-52a8-4e99-88ad-d08ef17d7c3f","slug":"hr-technology","label":"HR Technology","description":"ATS, HRIS, payroll, and workforce management"},"topic":{"slug":"recruiting-applicant-tracking","label":"Recruiting & Applicant Tracking","description":"ATS, Recruiting CRM, Recruitment Marketing & Sourcing, Resume Parsing, Interview Scheduling, Video Interviewing","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Every mainstream ATS connects to job boards, calendars, and downstream vendors, but each connection uses a different mechanism and fails differently. Job feeds refresh on the board's crawl schedule rather than instantly, scheduling accuracy depends on each interviewer connecting a calendar, and source attribution survives only if the tracking token survives the click path. Duplicate candidate records are the most common reason data stops reconciling.","url":"/q/recruiting-stack-integrate-ats-crm-interview-scheduling-and-job"},{"id":"3bac1883-0c14-4b6f-976c-fd911d262bb6","slug":"whats-the-best-video-interviewing-software-and-are-one-way","question":"What's the best video interviewing software, and are one-way (asynchronous) interviews actually effective?","publishedAt":"2026-07-21T20:47:01.388","confidenceScore":82,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"e1a1da3c-52a8-4e99-88ad-d08ef17d7c3f","slug":"hr-technology","label":"HR Technology","description":"ATS, HRIS, payroll, and workforce management"},"topic":{"slug":"recruiting-applicant-tracking","label":"Recruiting & Applicant Tracking","description":"ATS, Recruiting CRM, Recruitment Marketing & Sourcing, Resume Parsing, Interview Scheduling, Video Interviewing","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Video interviewing splits into live interviewing with scorecards, one-way asynchronous platforms, and interview recording tools. Spark Hire and Willo publish prices; HireVue, VidCruiter and Jobma publish none. One-way interviews reliably cut scheduling work, but the validity evidence supports interview structure rather than the video format. Automated scoring adds Illinois, New York City and Colorado notice, consent and audit duties.","url":"/q/whats-the-best-video-interviewing-software-and-are-one-way"},{"id":"6a0b325a-7e5b-422e-b774-fbe3507ee1d5","slug":"whats-the-best-candidate-sourcing-and-recruitment-marketing-software","question":"What's the best candidate sourcing and recruitment marketing software, and does AI sourcing actually work?","publishedAt":"2026-07-21T20:46:58.551","confidenceScore":82,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"e1a1da3c-52a8-4e99-88ad-d08ef17d7c3f","slug":"hr-technology","label":"HR Technology","description":"ATS, HRIS, payroll, and workforce management"},"topic":{"slug":"recruiting-applicant-tracking","label":"Recruiting & Applicant Tracking","description":"ATS, Recruiting CRM, Recruitment Marketing & Sourcing, Resume Parsing, Interview Scheduling, Video Interviewing","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Sourcing software and recruitment marketing software are different categories. Sourcing tools find and contact passive candidates; recruitment marketing tools build a pipeline through career sites, talent CRM, and job distribution. Published prices run from roughly $99 a month for a solo seat to quote-only enterprise contracts. AI helps most with search and outreach drafting, least with predicting job performance, and automated ranking carries bias risk plus compliance duties in New York City, Illinois, and Colorado.","url":"/q/whats-the-best-candidate-sourcing-and-recruitment-marketing-software"}],"contributorStats":{"verifiedAnswers":224,"openDisputes":0},"schemaJson":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Question","name":"How much does recruiting software / an ATS cost, and what pricing models are there?","text":"How much does recruiting software / an ATS cost, and what pricing models are there?","url":"https://www.answerstack.io/q/how-much-does-recruiting-software-an-ats-cost","answerCount":1,"datePublished":"2026-07-18T15:44:04.351","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"AnswerStack Editorial Team","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AnswerStack"},"url":"https://www.answerstack.io/contributors/answer-stack"},"about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Recruiting & Applicant Tracking"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"HR Technology"}],"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Recruiting software and applicant tracking systems (ATS) span a wide price range, from free plans up to more than $125,000 per year, with most small and mid-sized employers landing between roughly $250 and $15,000 per year depending on company size and features.[11] Published entry pricing runs from about $15 per user per month for a lightweight tool like Manatal to $299 per month for headcount-based plans from Workable, while dedicated flat tiers such as JazzHR start near $1,000 per year.[2][1][4] Pricing follows five main models: per employee per month, per recruiter or seat, per active job slot, a flat monthly or annual tier, and a custom enterprise quote.[10][11] Many mid-market and enterprise platforms, including Greenhouse and Lever, publish no prices and quote each buyer on company size, hiring volume, and feature depth, so aggregated buyer data puts a typical Greenhouse contract near $26,600 per year.[6][7][12] The subscription usually excludes implementation, job board and sponsored postings, assessments, background checks, and integrations, which can add materially to the first-year total.[10]","url":"https://www.answerstack.io/q/how-much-does-recruiting-software-an-ats-cost","upvoteCount":0,"datePublished":"2026-07-18T15:44:04.351","dateModified":"2026-07-17T00:00:00","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"AnswerStack Editorial Team","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AnswerStack"},"url":"https://www.answerstack.io/contributors/answer-stack"},"citation":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Workable Pricing: Plans and Add-ons","url":"https://www.workable.com/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Manatal Pricing","url":"https://www.manatal.com/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Breezy HR Pricing","url":"https://breezy.hr/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"JazzHR Pricing","url":"https://www.jazzhr.com/pricing/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Ashby Pricing","url":"https://www.ashbyhq.com/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Greenhouse Pricing","url":"https://www.greenhouse.com/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Lever Pricing","url":"https://www.lever.co/pricing/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"BambooHR Pricing","url":"https://www.bamboohr.com/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Zoho Recruit Pricing","url":"https://www.zoho.com/recruit/pricing.html"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Applicant Tracking Software Pricing Models","url":"https://www.softwareadvice.com/resources/applicant-tracking-software-pricing-models/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Applicant Tracking System Pricing Guide","url":"https://www.selectsoftwarereviews.com/blog/ats-pricing-short-guide"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Greenhouse Software Pricing and Plans","url":"https://www.vendr.com/marketplace/greenhouse"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Zoho Recruit Pricing 2026","url":"https://www.pin.com/blog/zoho-recruit-pricing/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Recruitee Pricing","url":"https://recruitee.com/pricing"}]}}}