Often yes, though almost never from a published rate card. Among immigration-specific platforms, eImmigration by Cerenade is the one that puts a nonprofit term in writing on its own site: 50% off the standard monthly rate in exchange for an annual commitment, with schools and universities also qualifying, and no combining it with the annual-billing or per-user volume discounts, as of August 2026 [1][2]. Docketwise publishes per-user list prices with no nonprofit rate anywhere on that page, while LollyLaw and Mitratech's INSZoom publish no prices at all and route buyers to a demo [3][4][5]. Outside the immigration niche the break is usually structural rather than a percentage: LegalServer sells to civil legal aid by organization and gives pro bono attorneys and volunteers free access [6][7], and Salesforce donates 10 licenses to eligible nonprofits before any paid seat begins [10]. Because so little of this is published, ask every shortlisted vendor for its nonprofit rate, eligibility proof, term length, stacking rules, and renewal price in writing.
\n","summary":"Most legal tech vendors will discount for a nonprofit legal services program, but very few print the terms. A check of immigration and legal aid platforms in August 2026 found one immigration-specific vendor publishing a nonprofit percentage, several publishing no price at all, and legal aid specialists pricing by organization rather than by seat. The work that decides your budget is getting the percentage, the eligibility proof, the commitment length, the stacking rules, and the renewal rate into a written quote.","publishedAt":"2026-08-13T16:53:00","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","editorialStatus":"APPROVED","lastReviewedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","nextReviewDueAt":"2026-11-13T00:00:00","templateVersion":"v2","aliases":["Is there a nonprofit discount for immigration case management software?","Do legal aid organizations pay less for case management software?","How much do nonprofits pay for immigration case management software?","What software discounts exist for nonprofit immigration legal services?","Do immigration software vendors offer nonprofit pricing?","Nonprofit pricing for immigration legal software","How do legal aid programs budget for case management software?","Can a grant pay for immigration case management software?","Which case management vendors publish nonprofit rates?","How do you negotiate nonprofit pricing with a legal tech vendor?","Does an annual software commitment work on a grant-funded budget?","Do DOJ accredited nonprofit programs get legal software discounts?"],"confidenceScore":85,"confidenceLabel":"High","canonicalUrl":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"contributorOrganizationProfile":{"entityId":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","legalName":null,"description":null,"websiteUrl":null,"imageUrl":null,"slogan":null,"subtitle":null,"facts":[],"coiNote":null,"foundingDate":null,"numberOfEmployeesText":null,"contactPoint":null,"address":null,"headquartersText":null,"organizationType":null},"contributorPerson":{"slug":"answerstack-editorial-team","displayName":"AnswerStack Editorial Team"},"sections":[{"id":"ef728f55-39f7-4787-9b8f-f7582dfe1606","sectionKey":"how_nonprofit_pricing_works","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How does nonprofit pricing work in legal case management software?","introMarkdown":"Three routes exist, and only one of them is a number you can look up before you talk to a salesperson. Knowing which route a vendor is on tells you how much of the buying work falls on your staff.\n\n### A published nonprofit rate\nA small number of vendors print the term on the site. eImmigration by Cerenade states a 50% nonprofit discount on every annual subscription, and its pricing FAQ adds the conditions: 50% off the standard monthly rate on an annual term, schools and universities also qualify, and no combining it with the lower annual-billing rate or the progressive discount based on number of users, as of August 2026 [1][2]. Published terms are rare enough that they work as a benchmark. If one vendor will document 50% on a public page, a vague verbal offer from another is worth pushing on.\n\n### Ask, then negotiate\nThis is the common case, and it puts the burden on you. Docketwise publishes list prices of $69, $99, and $119 per user per month on annual billing as of August 2026 and says nothing about nonprofits on that page [3]. LollyLaw and Mitratech's INSZoom publish no prices at all and send every visitor to a demo request [4][5]. A nonprofit rate may well exist at all three, but it lives inside a sales conversation, so nothing enters your budget until someone emails it to you.\n\n### Products built for the nonprofit sector\nSome systems are designed for legal services organizations and priced on a different shape entirely. LegalServer says it is built exclusively for civil legal aid, public defense, and government legal work, and gives pro bono attorneys and volunteers free access [6]. The CMS Guide published by Housing Action Illinois, an independent review for nonprofit housing and legal programs, lists LegalServer starting around $7,200 a year for up to 40 users, with onboarding from about $7,500 [7]. The Clio for Legal Aid project site describes a case management system adapted for legal aid organizations, listing grant management and custom reporting among its features, with no price published [8]. Justiceserver is a Salesforce-based platform for nonprofit legal services organizations [9], and Salesforce separately donates 10 Nonprofit Cloud or Sales and Service Cloud licenses to eligible nonprofits through Power of Us, with discounts beyond those [10]. Whether donated licenses reach a partner-built application is a question for both vendors, and worth asking before you model the cost.","introHtml":"Three routes exist, and only one of them is a number you can look up before you talk to a salesperson. Knowing which route a vendor is on tells you how much of the buying work falls on your staff.
\nA small number of vendors print the term on the site. eImmigration by Cerenade states a 50% nonprofit discount on every annual subscription, and its pricing FAQ adds the conditions: 50% off the standard monthly rate on an annual term, schools and universities also qualify, and no combining it with the lower annual-billing rate or the progressive discount based on number of users, as of August 2026 [1][2]. Published terms are rare enough that they work as a benchmark. If one vendor will document 50% on a public page, a vague verbal offer from another is worth pushing on.
\nThis is the common case, and it puts the burden on you. Docketwise publishes list prices of $69, $99, and $119 per user per month on annual billing as of August 2026 and says nothing about nonprofits on that page [3]. LollyLaw and Mitratech's INSZoom publish no prices at all and send every visitor to a demo request [4][5]. A nonprofit rate may well exist at all three, but it lives inside a sales conversation, so nothing enters your budget until someone emails it to you.
\nSome systems are designed for legal services organizations and priced on a different shape entirely. LegalServer says it is built exclusively for civil legal aid, public defense, and government legal work, and gives pro bono attorneys and volunteers free access [6]. The CMS Guide published by Housing Action Illinois, an independent review for nonprofit housing and legal programs, lists LegalServer starting around $7,200 a year for up to 40 users, with onboarding from about $7,500 [7]. The Clio for Legal Aid project site describes a case management system adapted for legal aid organizations, listing grant management and custom reporting among its features, with no price published [8]. Justiceserver is a Salesforce-based platform for nonprofit legal services organizations [9], and Salesforce separately donates 10 Nonprofit Cloud or Sales and Service Cloud licenses to eligible nonprofits through Power of Us, with discounts beyond those [10]. Whether donated licenses reach a partner-built application is a question for both vendors, and worth asking before you model the cost.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":10},{"id":"7cbcac23-110d-47fa-ac16-8fe326f05591","sectionKey":"published_terms_table","sectionType":"table_section","heading":"What do case management vendors actually publish about nonprofit pricing?","introMarkdown":"Every cell below was read from the vendor's own live page in August 2026. Where a column says nothing is published, that absence is the finding.","introHtml":"Every cell below was read from the vendor's own live page in August 2026. Where a column says nothing is published, that absence is the finding.
\n","outroMarkdown":"One of the seven publishes a nonprofit percentage, and four publish no price of any kind. The distribution matters more than any single row, because it tells you a discount is usually available and almost never documented until you ask for it. For eImmigration the useful detail is not the 50% by itself but the conditions attached to it, since an annual term and a stacking restriction both land in your budget [1]. For Docketwise the useful detail is that a vendor can publish transparent per-user pricing and still say nothing about the sector [3]. With LollyLaw and INSZoom, expect a call just to establish the list price [4][5]. LegalServer, Clio for Legal Aid, and Justiceserver are shaped around legal services organizations rather than firms, so the comparison shifts from percentage off to whether the reporting and intake model fits how your program is funded [6][8][9].","outroHtml":"One of the seven publishes a nonprofit percentage, and four publish no price of any kind. The distribution matters more than any single row, because it tells you a discount is usually available and almost never documented until you ask for it. For eImmigration the useful detail is not the 50% by itself but the conditions attached to it, since an annual term and a stacking restriction both land in your budget [1]. For Docketwise the useful detail is that a vendor can publish transparent per-user pricing and still say nothing about the sector [3]. With LollyLaw and INSZoom, expect a call just to establish the list price [4][5]. LegalServer, Clio for Legal Aid, and Justiceserver are shaped around legal services organizations rather than firms, so the comparison shifts from percentage off to whether the reporting and intake model fits how your program is funded [6][8][9].
\n","contentJson":{"rows":[{"cells":["eImmigration by Cerenade","$60, $90, $110 per user per month standard; $55, $82, $100 on annual billing [1]","50% off the standard monthly rate on an annual term; schools and universities qualify; not combinable with the annual or volume discounts [1][2]","Eligibility proof, renewal rate, migration cost"]},{"cells":["Docketwise","$69, $99, $119 per user per month on annual billing [3]","Nothing on the pricing page [3]","Whether a nonprofit rate exists at all"]},{"cells":["LollyLaw","None published; demo request only [4]","Nothing published [4]","The list price before any discount"]},{"cells":["INSZoom (Mitratech)","None published; demo request only [5]","Nothing published [5]","Seat minimums and enterprise term length"]},{"cells":["LegalServer","None on the vendor site; an independent guide lists about $7,200 per year for up to 40 users plus about $7,500 onboarding [6][7]","Sector-specific model; free access for pro bono attorneys and volunteers [6]","A current quote, module fees, migration scope"]},{"cells":["Clio for Legal Aid","None published [8]","A legal aid adaptation with grant management and custom reporting [8]","The per-seat rate and how the legal aid edition is licensed"]},{"cells":["Justiceserver","None published; a fixed-fee intake assessment listed at $2,500 [9]","Built for nonprofit legal services organizations [9]","Underlying Salesforce license cost and whether donated licenses apply [10]"]}],"columns":["Platform","Published price as of August 2026","Published nonprofit term","What you still have to ask for"]},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":20},{"id":"5d6b60c4-0ae7-48c4-98ae-15f4c45baf11","sectionKey":"what_to_ask_table","sectionType":"table_section","heading":"What should you ask every vendor to put in writing?","introMarkdown":"Six items turn a verbal offer into something a finance director and a funder can both work from. Send them as a single email and treat the reply as the quote.","introHtml":"Six items turn a verbal offer into something a finance director and a funder can both work from. Send them as a single email and treat the reply as the quote.
\n","outroMarkdown":"The next three sections take these six apart in pairs, because the reasoning behind each one is what makes the vendor's answer easy or hard to evaluate.","outroHtml":"The next three sections take these six apart in pairs, because the reasoning behind each one is what makes the vendor's answer easy or hard to evaluate.
\n","contentJson":{"rows":[{"cells":["The discount as a percentage and as a dollar figure","Funders approve line items, not verbal promises","50% off the standard monthly rate, $45 per user per month, 20 users, $10,800 for 12 months"]},{"cells":["Eligibility criteria and the proof required","Fiscally sponsored programs, DOJ-accredited agencies, and university clinics do not all qualify the same way","IRS determination letter accepted, fiscal sponsor letter accepted, recertified annually"]},{"cells":["Term length and mid-term change rules","Federal cost rules tie charges to the approved budget period [11]","12 months from activation, seats reducible at renewal, written termination terms"]},{"cells":["Stacking rules against volume and annual discounts","A 50% rate that blocks volume tiers may be worse at 40 seats than at 6 [1]","The nonprofit rate replaces volume tiers, and here is the volume table so you can compare"]},{"cells":["The renewal rate","Year two is where a grant-funded budget usually breaks","The nonprofit rate is guaranteed at renewal, or capped at a stated percentage increase"]},{"cells":["One-time costs and exit terms","Migration, onboarding, and export are rarely inside the seat price [7]","Data migration quoted at a fixed figure, training included, one free export on cancellation"]}],"columns":["Ask for this","Why a grant budget cares","A usable answer looks like"]},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":30},{"id":"f6b3a249-464a-4645-a5b0-c4bf69e74f99","sectionKey":"discount_size_and_eligibility","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How large is a nonprofit discount, and who qualifies for one?","introMarkdown":"The only nonprofit percentage published on an immigration-specific platform in this review is 50%, and it comes with an annual term attached [1][2]. Applied to the published plans, that turns $60, $90, and $110 per user per month into $30, $45, and $55 [1]. For a 20-seat program on the middle plan, the annual-billing rate of $82 per user works out to $19,680 a year, while the nonprofit rate of $45 works out to $10,800, a difference of $8,880 [1].\n\n### The eligibility question nobody publishes\nNeither the nonprofit page nor the pricing FAQ defines what documentation establishes nonprofit, school, or university status [1][2], which makes that the first thing to settle by email. Ask three specific questions rather than one general one: whether an IRS determination letter in a fiscal sponsor's name is accepted for a sponsored program, whether recognition of a DOJ-accredited representative program under a parent agency qualifies the program or only the parent, and whether eligibility is verified once or recertified at each renewal. Programs that share a legal entity with a diocese, a university, or a social services agency get tripped up on all three.\n\n### Named customers are evidence of use, not evidence of terms\nThe vendor's nonprofit page displays RAICES, The Legal Aid Society, the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, and the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area as customer logos, and quotes staff from the Immigrant Legal Center and the Central American Resource Center [2]. Those are organizations shown on the vendor's page. They establish that nonprofit immigration programs of real size run on the product, and say nothing about what any of them pays or whether the current published discount is the one they received. A logo wall is most useful as a list of reference calls to request, because a director at a similar-sized program can tell you what they actually pay and how the eligibility check went for them.","introHtml":"The only nonprofit percentage published on an immigration-specific platform in this review is 50%, and it comes with an annual term attached [1][2]. Applied to the published plans, that turns $60, $90, and $110 per user per month into $30, $45, and $55 [1]. For a 20-seat program on the middle plan, the annual-billing rate of $82 per user works out to $19,680 a year, while the nonprofit rate of $45 works out to $10,800, a difference of $8,880 [1].
\nNeither the nonprofit page nor the pricing FAQ defines what documentation establishes nonprofit, school, or university status [1][2], which makes that the first thing to settle by email. Ask three specific questions rather than one general one: whether an IRS determination letter in a fiscal sponsor's name is accepted for a sponsored program, whether recognition of a DOJ-accredited representative program under a parent agency qualifies the program or only the parent, and whether eligibility is verified once or recertified at each renewal. Programs that share a legal entity with a diocese, a university, or a social services agency get tripped up on all three.
\nThe vendor's nonprofit page displays RAICES, The Legal Aid Society, the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, and the Immigration Institute of the Bay Area as customer logos, and quotes staff from the Immigrant Legal Center and the Central American Resource Center [2]. Those are organizations shown on the vendor's page. They establish that nonprofit immigration programs of real size run on the product, and say nothing about what any of them pays or whether the current published discount is the one they received. A logo wall is most useful as a list of reference calls to request, because a director at a similar-sized program can tell you what they actually pay and how the eligibility check went for them.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":40},{"id":"30ae2fee-b3c8-466a-b0fc-56419fadfc50","sectionKey":"annual_commitment_and_stacking","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What do annual commitment and no stacking mean for a grant budget?","introMarkdown":"An annual commitment obligates the organization for 12 months regardless of whether the grant paying for it runs on the same calendar. Under the federal cost principles at 2 CFR 200.403, a cost charged to a federal award must be necessary and reasonable, allocable, consistently treated, adequately documented, and, apart from administrative closeout costs, incurred during the approved budget period [11]. A software term that straddles two budget periods has to be split across them or covered from unrestricted funds for the overlap, so the practical question to ask the vendor is whether the term can start on a date you choose rather than on the day the contract is signed.\n\n### What happens if the grant does not renew\nThe commitment survives the funding. That risk is worth pricing explicitly: ask what termination costs, whether seats can be reduced mid-term or only at renewal, and whether an unused portion converts to credit. A vendor that will put a seat-reduction clause in writing is offering something worth more than a few points of discount to a program funded on one-year cycles.\n\n### The stacking rule can cost more than the discount saves\nThe published eImmigration term states that the nonprofit discount cannot be combined with the lower annual-billing rate or the progressive discount based on number of users [1]. For a small program that comparison is easy, because 50% off $90 beats the $82 annual rate at any seat count. For a larger one it is not, because the volume tiers are not published, so a 40-seat or 70-seat program cannot tell from the page whether its volume tier would have beaten the flat 50%. Ask for the volume table in the same email that asks for the nonprofit rate, then run both numbers at your actual headcount, including the volunteers and interns you are about to add.\n\n### Check which base the percentage is calculated from\nThe published term takes 50% off the standard monthly rate rather than off an already-discounted annual rate [1]. Other vendors quote a nonprofit percentage off a rate that already includes an annual reduction, which quietly produces a smaller number, so ask every vendor for the base price and the discounted price side by side.","introHtml":"An annual commitment obligates the organization for 12 months regardless of whether the grant paying for it runs on the same calendar. Under the federal cost principles at 2 CFR 200.403, a cost charged to a federal award must be necessary and reasonable, allocable, consistently treated, adequately documented, and, apart from administrative closeout costs, incurred during the approved budget period [11]. A software term that straddles two budget periods has to be split across them or covered from unrestricted funds for the overlap, so the practical question to ask the vendor is whether the term can start on a date you choose rather than on the day the contract is signed.
\nThe commitment survives the funding. That risk is worth pricing explicitly: ask what termination costs, whether seats can be reduced mid-term or only at renewal, and whether an unused portion converts to credit. A vendor that will put a seat-reduction clause in writing is offering something worth more than a few points of discount to a program funded on one-year cycles.
\nThe published eImmigration term states that the nonprofit discount cannot be combined with the lower annual-billing rate or the progressive discount based on number of users [1]. For a small program that comparison is easy, because 50% off $90 beats the $82 annual rate at any seat count. For a larger one it is not, because the volume tiers are not published, so a 40-seat or 70-seat program cannot tell from the page whether its volume tier would have beaten the flat 50%. Ask for the volume table in the same email that asks for the nonprofit rate, then run both numbers at your actual headcount, including the volunteers and interns you are about to add.
\nThe published term takes 50% off the standard monthly rate rather than off an already-discounted annual rate [1]. Other vendors quote a nonprofit percentage off a rate that already includes an annual reduction, which quietly produces a smaller number, so ask every vendor for the base price and the discounted price side by side.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":50},{"id":"76bf0090-2846-497b-b9af-5cbb95844cc4","sectionKey":"costs_that_survive_the_discount","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"Which costs survive a nonprofit discount?","introMarkdown":"Seat count, implementation, and renewal pricing are where a discounted subscription quietly returns to full price.\n\n### Who counts as a user\nSeat definitions matter more in a nonprofit legal program than in a firm, because the people touching a case include DOJ-accredited representatives, volunteer attorneys, law students, interns, and clinic supervisors who may work a few hours a week each. Ask whether a seat is per named person or per concurrent login, and whether read-only or volunteer accounts are free. LegalServer publishes free access for pro bono attorneys and volunteers, which is a materially different economic model for a program that runs monthly clinics than any percentage off a per-seat rate [6].\n\n### One-time costs are quoted separately and discounted rarely\nThe independent CMS Guide from Housing Action Illinois lists LegalServer onboarding starting around $7,500, with additional charges for data and document migration that scale with the number of fields and documents moved, a HUD 9902 integration module at $4,200 plus $1,800 a year in maintenance, and remote implementation that can run eight weeks or longer [7]. Justiceserver publishes a $2,500 fixed-fee intake assessment as a scoped service separate from any license [9]. Neither pattern is unusual, and neither is normally covered by a nonprofit percentage, so a first-year budget needs a second line for professional services.\n\n### The renewal rate is the number that decides year three\nDiscounts introduced to win a deal are not always guaranteed at renewal, and a program that built a grant budget on year-one pricing has no room when the rate resets. Get the renewal treatment in the same written quote: either the nonprofit rate persists for the life of the account, or increases are capped at a stated percentage, or you know now that you will renegotiate every year.","introHtml":"Seat count, implementation, and renewal pricing are where a discounted subscription quietly returns to full price.
\nSeat definitions matter more in a nonprofit legal program than in a firm, because the people touching a case include DOJ-accredited representatives, volunteer attorneys, law students, interns, and clinic supervisors who may work a few hours a week each. Ask whether a seat is per named person or per concurrent login, and whether read-only or volunteer accounts are free. LegalServer publishes free access for pro bono attorneys and volunteers, which is a materially different economic model for a program that runs monthly clinics than any percentage off a per-seat rate [6].
\nThe independent CMS Guide from Housing Action Illinois lists LegalServer onboarding starting around $7,500, with additional charges for data and document migration that scale with the number of fields and documents moved, a HUD 9902 integration module at $4,200 plus $1,800 a year in maintenance, and remote implementation that can run eight weeks or longer [7]. Justiceserver publishes a $2,500 fixed-fee intake assessment as a scoped service separate from any license [9]. Neither pattern is unusual, and neither is normally covered by a nonprofit percentage, so a first-year budget needs a second line for professional services.
\nDiscounts introduced to win a deal are not always guaranteed at renewal, and a program that built a grant budget on year-one pricing has no room when the rate resets. Get the renewal treatment in the same written quote: either the nonprofit rate persists for the life of the account, or increases are capped at a stated percentage, or you know now that you will renegotiate every year.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":60},{"id":"68e5704e-352e-40f7-8375-92b63052c246","sectionKey":"grant_and_funder_considerations","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What will your funders want to see?","introMarkdown":"Funders care about two things the vendor conversation rarely covers: how the cost is allocated across programs, and whether the system can produce the reports your grants require. Both should shape the shortlist before price does.\n\n### Allocation and consistent treatment\nCase management software used across several programs is allocable to each of them, and 2 CFR 200.403 requires that a cost be accorded consistent treatment, with the specific warning that a cost must not be charged to a federal award as a direct cost if the same cost in like circumstances has been allocated as an indirect cost [11]. Decide up front whether seats are a direct program cost or part of your indirect rate, document the method, and apply it the same way to every funder.\n\n### Reporting requirements usually outrank the seat price\nSystems built for legal services organizations sell on funder reporting rather than on features. LegalServer markets reporting across multiple different funders [6], the Clio for Legal Aid project lists grant management and custom reporting among its core features [8], and Justiceserver lists real-time reports and dashboards aimed at staff, leaders, and grant funders [9]. A cheaper seat that cannot produce a required report converts into staff hours every reporting cycle, which erases the license saving in staff time inside a year or two.\n\n### Where immigration programs sit in the funding map\nMost nonprofit immigration legal programs cannot fund technology the way a civil legal aid office does. Legal Services Corporation regulations at 45 CFR part 1626 exist to ensure recipients provide legal assistance only to citizens and eligible aliens, and 45 CFR 1626.3 states that recipients may not provide legal assistance for or on behalf of an ineligible alien [13]. LSC's Technology Initiative Grant program, funded since Congress first appropriated for it in 2000, awards that money only to existing LSC grantees [12]. So immigration programs generally fund case management software through state and local contracts, foundations, private grants, and unrestricted revenue, which means the approver for the line item is usually your own board or a program officer. The Legal Services National Technology Assistance Project maintains a legal aid tech stack database assembled as a starting point for that research [14].","introHtml":"Funders care about two things the vendor conversation rarely covers: how the cost is allocated across programs, and whether the system can produce the reports your grants require. Both should shape the shortlist before price does.
\nCase management software used across several programs is allocable to each of them, and 2 CFR 200.403 requires that a cost be accorded consistent treatment, with the specific warning that a cost must not be charged to a federal award as a direct cost if the same cost in like circumstances has been allocated as an indirect cost [11]. Decide up front whether seats are a direct program cost or part of your indirect rate, document the method, and apply it the same way to every funder.
\nSystems built for legal services organizations sell on funder reporting rather than on features. LegalServer markets reporting across multiple different funders [6], the Clio for Legal Aid project lists grant management and custom reporting among its core features [8], and Justiceserver lists real-time reports and dashboards aimed at staff, leaders, and grant funders [9]. A cheaper seat that cannot produce a required report converts into staff hours every reporting cycle, which erases the license saving in staff time inside a year or two.
\nMost nonprofit immigration legal programs cannot fund technology the way a civil legal aid office does. Legal Services Corporation regulations at 45 CFR part 1626 exist to ensure recipients provide legal assistance only to citizens and eligible aliens, and 45 CFR 1626.3 states that recipients may not provide legal assistance for or on behalf of an ineligible alien [13]. LSC's Technology Initiative Grant program, funded since Congress first appropriated for it in 2000, awards that money only to existing LSC grantees [12]. So immigration programs generally fund case management software through state and local contracts, foundations, private grants, and unrestricted revenue, which means the approver for the line item is usually your own board or a program officer. The Legal Services National Technology Assistance Project maintains a legal aid tech stack database assembled as a starting point for that research [14].
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":70},{"id":"0fbb7c16-60ce-428a-8d26-2ef12761b0f4","sectionKey":"contributor_perspective","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"How this answer was researched","introMarkdown":"Every price, discount term, and eligibility statement here was read directly from the publisher's live page in August 2026 rather than from a review site, and each is dated because vendor pricing pages change without notice. Vendor pages verify only that the vendor published the claim, so terms attributed to eImmigration, Docketwise, LegalServer, Clio for Legal Aid, Justiceserver, and Salesforce are reported as published terms and not as audited facts. Federal cost principles are quoted from the eCFR, and the Legal Services Corporation material comes from LSC's own program pages and regulations. Two sources that would have added useful independent perspective, CLINIC's case management toolkit and Clio's main pricing page, returned access blocks to automated retrieval on the research date and are therefore not cited here. Immigration practitioners, legal aid technology directors, and finance staff who have negotiated nonprofit terms are invited to contribute corrections, current quotes, and eligibility experiences so this record stays accurate.","introHtml":"Every price, discount term, and eligibility statement here was read directly from the publisher's live page in August 2026 rather than from a review site, and each is dated because vendor pricing pages change without notice. Vendor pages verify only that the vendor published the claim, so terms attributed to eImmigration, Docketwise, LegalServer, Clio for Legal Aid, Justiceserver, and Salesforce are reported as published terms and not as audited facts. Federal cost principles are quoted from the eCFR, and the Legal Services Corporation material comes from LSC's own program pages and regulations. Two sources that would have added useful independent perspective, CLINIC's case management toolkit and Clio's main pricing page, returned access blocks to automated retrieval on the research date and are therefore not cited here. Immigration practitioners, legal aid technology directors, and finance staff who have negotiated nonprofit terms are invited to contribute corrections, current quotes, and eligibility experiences so this record stays accurate.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":"This answer was written and reviewed by the AnswerStack Editorial Team, which has no commercial stake in the products, companies, or methods discussed. Every claim is cited inline and verified on the dates shown.","noteHtml":"This answer was written and reviewed by the AnswerStack Editorial Team, which has no commercial stake in the products, companies, or methods discussed. Every claim is cited inline and verified on the dates shown.
\n","sortOrder":80},{"id":"344db991-3ca5-4a32-91e8-b803aecb510f","sectionKey":"trade_offs","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"Trade-offs and limits worth knowing","introMarkdown":"A nonprofit rate is a real saving with real conditions, and several of those conditions bite hardest at exactly the size where the saving looks biggest.\n\n### A flat percentage can lose to volume pricing\nWhere a nonprofit discount cannot be combined with volume tiers, a large program may do better on the commercial path, and the published pages do not give you enough to check [1].\n\n### An annual term buys the rate by removing your flexibility\nCommitting for twelve months removes your ability to shrink mid-year, which is the opposite of how one-year grant cycles behave [11]. Programs with volatile headcount sometimes come out ahead on a monthly rate they can cut in month seven.\n\n### Sector-built systems cost more to start\nPlatforms designed for legal services organizations tend to carry meaningful implementation cost and timeline, with onboarding starting around $7,500 and implementations of eight weeks or longer in one published example [7]. That is often worth it for funder reporting, and it is not a small first-year number.\n\n### Published terms are not contracts\nA discount on a marketing page can change at any time and is superseded by whatever your order form says. The written quote governs, which is why getting the terms in email matters more than finding them on a website.","introHtml":"A nonprofit rate is a real saving with real conditions, and several of those conditions bite hardest at exactly the size where the saving looks biggest.
\nWhere a nonprofit discount cannot be combined with volume tiers, a large program may do better on the commercial path, and the published pages do not give you enough to check [1].
\nCommitting for twelve months removes your ability to shrink mid-year, which is the opposite of how one-year grant cycles behave [11]. Programs with volatile headcount sometimes come out ahead on a monthly rate they can cut in month seven.
\nPlatforms designed for legal services organizations tend to carry meaningful implementation cost and timeline, with onboarding starting around $7,500 and implementations of eight weeks or longer in one published example [7]. That is often worth it for funder reporting, and it is not a small first-year number.
\nA discount on a marketing page can change at any time and is superseded by whatever your order form says. The written quote governs, which is why getting the terms in email matters more than finding them on a website.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":90},{"id":"652c4422-6515-4239-b14a-54362d0e0963","sectionKey":"what_a_nonprofit_discount_is_not","sectionType":"markdown_section","heading":"What a nonprofit discount is not","introMarkdown":"Several things get filed under nonprofit pricing that behave very differently once they hit a budget.\n\n### It is not a donation\nA percentage off a subscription and a donated license are different mechanisms with different accounting. Salesforce donates 10 Nonprofit Cloud or Sales and Service Cloud licenses to eligible nonprofits through Power of Us and discounts licenses beyond those, with most products on annual contracts [10]. A donated license removes the cost entirely, while a discount reduces it for as long as the term holds and the vendor keeps honoring it.\n\n### It is not automatic\nNothing verifies your exempt status and applies a rate. Every documented program in this review requires an application or a sales conversation, and the eligibility proof is defined in neither of the published eImmigration pages [1][2].\n\n### It is not the same as free volunteer access\nFree pro bono and volunteer seats, published by LegalServer, change how many paid seats you need rather than what each paid seat costs [6]. For a clinic-heavy program that mechanism can be worth more than a larger percentage.\n\n### It is not grant funding for technology\nA discount lowers what you owe a vendor, while a technology grant gives you money to spend. LSC's Technology Initiative Grants are the second kind and go only to existing LSC grantees [12], which leaves out most nonprofit immigration programs because of the eligibility restrictions in 45 CFR part 1626 [13].\n\n### It is not a reason to pick the wrong system\nA discounted platform that cannot produce your funder reports or cover the agencies you file with costs more in staff time than it saves in license fees. It usually works better to run the fit test first and price only the two or three systems that survive it.","introHtml":"Several things get filed under nonprofit pricing that behave very differently once they hit a budget.
\nA percentage off a subscription and a donated license are different mechanisms with different accounting. Salesforce donates 10 Nonprofit Cloud or Sales and Service Cloud licenses to eligible nonprofits through Power of Us and discounts licenses beyond those, with most products on annual contracts [10]. A donated license removes the cost entirely, while a discount reduces it for as long as the term holds and the vendor keeps honoring it.
\nNothing verifies your exempt status and applies a rate. Every documented program in this review requires an application or a sales conversation, and the eligibility proof is defined in neither of the published eImmigration pages [1][2].
\nFree pro bono and volunteer seats, published by LegalServer, change how many paid seats you need rather than what each paid seat costs [6]. For a clinic-heavy program that mechanism can be worth more than a larger percentage.
\nA discount lowers what you owe a vendor, while a technology grant gives you money to spend. LSC's Technology Initiative Grants are the second kind and go only to existing LSC grantees [12], which leaves out most nonprofit immigration programs because of the eligibility restrictions in 45 CFR part 1626 [13].
\nA discounted platform that cannot produce your funder reports or cover the agencies you file with costs more in staff time than it saves in license fees. It usually works better to run the fit test first and price only the two or three systems that survive it.
\n","outroMarkdown":null,"outroHtml":null,"contentJson":{},"configJson":{},"noteMarkdown":null,"noteHtml":null,"sortOrder":100}],"citations":[{"title":"Pricing | eimmigration Law Software","url":"https://get.eimmigration.com/pricing","excerpt":"Non-profit organizations receive 50% off the standard monthly rate when committing to an annual term. Schools and universities also qualify for this discount. The non-profit discount cannot be combined with options 1 or 2.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"eImmigration's published plan prices, the four discount types, the 50% nonprofit discount on the standard monthly rate with an annual term, school and university eligibility, and the rule that the nonprofit discount cannot be combined with the annual or volume discounts.","domain":"get.eimmigration.com","publisherName":"Cerenade"},{"title":"Immigration Software for Non-Profits | eimmigration","url":"https://get.eimmigration.com/solutions/non-profits","excerpt":"50% non-profit discount on every annual subscription","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"SUPPORTING","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"The published 50% nonprofit discount on annual subscriptions, and the nonprofit organizations displayed as customer logos and testimonials on the vendor's page.","domain":"get.eimmigration.com","publisherName":"Cerenade"},{"title":"Docketwise Pricing | Powerful Immigration Software","url":"https://www.docketwise.com/pricing/","excerpt":"Enjoy unlimited cases with transparent pricing.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"Published per-user pricing of $69, $99, and $119 per month on annual billing, and the absence of any nonprofit term on the pricing page.","domain":"docketwise.com","publisherName":"Docketwise"},{"title":"LollyLaw: All-In-One Immigration Case Management Software","url":"https://lollylaw.com/","excerpt":"Get a Demo","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"No published pricing and no published nonprofit term; the site routes visitors to a demo request.","domain":"lollylaw.com","publisherName":"LollyLaw"},{"title":"INSZoom Immigration Case Management","url":"https://www.mitratech.com/products/inszoom/","excerpt":"REQUEST A DEMO","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"No published pricing and no published nonprofit term; the product page routes to a demo request.","domain":"mitratech.com","publisherName":"Mitratech"},{"title":"Civil Legal Aid Case Management Software","url":"https://www.legalserver.org/civil-legal-aid/","excerpt":"LegalServer is built exclusively for civil legal aid, public defense, and government legal work.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"LegalServer's sector focus, its free access for pro bono attorneys and volunteers, and its funder reporting positioning.","domain":"legalserver.org","publisherName":"LegalServer"},{"title":"CMS Guide 3.0: LegalServer","url":"https://housingactionil.org/cms-guide-v3/comparison/legalserver/","excerpt":"Pricing starts at about $7,500 for onboarding","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"Independent figures for LegalServer: onboarding starting around $7,500, annual pricing from about $7,200 for up to 40 users, the HUD 9902 module at $4,200 plus $1,800 a year, and implementation of eight weeks or longer.","domain":"housingactionil.org","publisherName":"Housing Action Illinois"},{"title":"Clio for Legal Aid","url":"https://www.clioforlegalaid.com/","excerpt":"The award-winning case management system, adapted for legal aid organizations.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"A legal aid adaptation of a commercial case management system with grant management and custom reporting features, intake and case transfer tools developed by A2J Tech, and no published price.","domain":"clioforlegalaid.com","publisherName":"Clio for Legal Aid"},{"title":"Justiceserver | Legal Case Management Built for Nonprofit Legal Aid","url":"https://www.justiceserver.org/","excerpt":"$2,500 fixed fee; no hourly billing","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"A Salesforce-based case management platform designed for nonprofit legal services organizations, its grant funder reporting features, and its $2,500 fixed-fee intake assessment.","domain":"justiceserver.org","publisherName":"Justiceserver"},{"title":"Nonprofit Pricing | Salesforce","url":"https://www.salesforce.com/nonprofit/pricing/","excerpt":"any eligible nonprofit receives 10 Salesforce Nonprofit Cloud or Sales/Service Cloud licenses, at no cost","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"The Power of Us donation of 10 licenses to eligible nonprofits, discounts on additional licenses, and the use of annual contracts.","domain":"salesforce.com","publisherName":"Salesforce"},{"title":"2 CFR 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs","url":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/section-200.403","excerpt":"All other costs must be incurred during the approved budget period.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"Federal cost principles requiring costs to be necessary, reasonable, allocable, consistently treated, and incurred during the approved budget period apart from closeout costs.","domain":"ecfr.gov","publisherName":"Office of Management and Budget (eCFR)"},{"title":"Technology Initiative Grant Program","url":"https://www.lsc.gov/grants/technology-initiative-grant-program","excerpt":"LSC's Technology Initiative Grant (TIG) program awards special funding to existing LSC grantees to support creative and innovative uses of technology","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"TIG funding is awarded to existing LSC grantees, has run since Congress first appropriated for it in 2000, and reports on roughly six-month cycles.","domain":"lsc.gov","publisherName":"Legal Services Corporation"},{"title":"45 CFR Part 1626 Restrictions on legal assistance to aliens","url":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/part-1626","excerpt":"Recipients may not provide legal assistance for or on behalf of an ineligible alien.","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"PRIMARY","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"LSC recipients may provide legal assistance only to citizens and eligible aliens, and may not provide legal assistance for or on behalf of an ineligible alien.","domain":"ecfr.gov","publisherName":"Legal Services Corporation (eCFR)"},{"title":"Legal Aid Tech Stack","url":"https://www.lsntap.org/tools-resources/legal-aid-tech-stack","excerpt":"we have begun assembling this database for legal aid organizations to use as a springboard for their research on what technology product they could use","quoteText":null,"sourceRole":"INDEPENDENT","verifiedAt":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","supportsText":"An independently maintained database legal aid organizations use as a starting point for researching technology products.","domain":"lsntap.org","publisherName":"Legal Services National Technology Assistance Project"}],"revisions":[],"relatedAnswers":[{"id":"44658f2b-07eb-4ae5-88ad-725a0eaa8ff1","slug":"how-should-firms-evaluate-uscis-form-automation","question":"How should firms evaluate USCIS form automation?","publishedAt":"2026-08-17T18:22:28.236","confidenceScore":92,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"a7b3fdc7-1217-4f39-8fc5-2e8e3f73c3d7","slug":"legal-technology","label":"Legal Technology","description":"Practice management, e-discovery, and compliance"},"topic":{"slug":"immigration-law-software","label":"Immigration Law Software","description":"Case management, USCIS form automation, client intake, billing, and security for immigration law firms and nonprofit legal aid programs.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"A rejected USCIS filing loses its filing date and cannot be appealed, which makes form automation the highest-stakes feature in an immigration platform. Nine tests, run live on your own data in a vendor demo, cover edition dates, agency coverage past USCIS, in-product instructions, auto-population, related-case packets, e-filing, update speed, blank forms, and the audit trail.","url":"/q/how-should-firms-evaluate-uscis-form-automation"},{"id":"92d1784a-ba89-4d6a-965b-55ed8ea1848b","slug":"how-much-does-immigration-case-management-software-cost","question":"How much does immigration case management software cost?","publishedAt":"2026-08-17T18:22:25.237","confidenceScore":88,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"a7b3fdc7-1217-4f39-8fc5-2e8e3f73c3d7","slug":"legal-technology","label":"Legal Technology","description":"Practice management, e-discovery, and compliance"},"topic":{"slug":"immigration-law-software","label":"Immigration Law Software","description":"Case management, USCIS form automation, client intake, billing, and security for immigration law firms and nonprofit legal aid programs.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Published per-seat prices for immigration-specific case management ran between $55 and $129 per user per month in August 2026, and two of the largest enterprise platforms publish no price at all. This answer maps the public numbers, converts them into an annual bill at three, eight, and twenty seats, and shows what sits outside the advertised per-user rate.","url":"/q/how-much-does-immigration-case-management-software-cost"},{"id":"a43e4c0c-0972-42fc-98a8-87c1507962ea","slug":"can-a-small-immigration-firm-use-clio-instead-of-specialized-immigration-software","question":"Can a small immigration firm use Clio instead of specialized immigration software?","publishedAt":"2026-08-05T14:27:00","confidenceScore":90,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"a7b3fdc7-1217-4f39-8fc5-2e8e3f73c3d7","slug":"legal-technology","label":"Legal Technology","description":"Practice management, e-discovery, and compliance"},"topic":{"slug":"immigration-law-software","label":"Immigration Law Software","description":"Case management, USCIS form automation, client intake, billing, and security for immigration law firms and nonprofit legal aid programs.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"Clio Manage is a general practice platform, and Clio itself routes immigration form work to Clio Draft or to integrations with Docketwise and Prima.Law. That makes the real decision a stack question rather than a brand question: who owns USCIS form editions, related-case packets, priority-date chart selection, and filings that run through USCIS, DOL FLAG, and EOIR ECAS. This answer maps what each layer publishes, what the hybrid setup actually syncs, and how caseload mix changes the call.","url":"/q/can-a-small-immigration-firm-use-clio-instead-of-specialized-immigration-software"},{"id":"af1fae7b-011b-407a-8421-f921930b0660","slug":"what-security-features-should-immigration-case-management-software-have","question":"What security features should immigration case management software have?","publishedAt":"2026-07-23T18:41:00","confidenceScore":91,"confidenceLabel":"High","industry":{"id":"a7b3fdc7-1217-4f39-8fc5-2e8e3f73c3d7","slug":"legal-technology","label":"Legal Technology","description":"Practice management, e-discovery, and compliance"},"topic":{"slug":"immigration-law-software","label":"Immigration Law Software","description":"Case management, USCIS form automation, client intake, billing, and security for immigration law firms and nonprofit legal aid programs.","schemaKind":null},"contributor":{"id":"ec39deab-44fe-48d8-9029-fefe993ab85a","slug":"answer-stack","displayName":"AnswerStack","websiteUrl":null},"snippet":"An immigration file holds a Social Security number, a passport number, an A-Number, financial history and a sealed medical exam, so the confidentiality rule sets the security bar well above a vendor feature list. Eleven requirements, each paired with the proof to demand in writing, cover encryption, authentication, tenant isolation, audit logs, backups, independent testing, export rights and breach-notice terms. Includes what two vendors publish, and what an April 2026 vendor incident should change in a contract.","url":"/q/what-security-features-should-immigration-case-management-software-have"}],"contributorStats":{"verifiedAnswers":269,"openDisputes":0},"schemaJson":{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Question","name":"Do nonprofit immigration legal aid programs get discounts on case management software?","text":"Do nonprofit immigration legal aid programs get discounts on case management software?","url":"https://www.answerstack.io/q/do-nonprofit-immigration-legal-aid-programs-get-discounts-on-case-management-software","answerCount":1,"datePublished":"2026-08-13T16:53:00","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"AnswerStack Editorial Team","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AnswerStack"},"url":"https://www.answerstack.io/contributors/answer-stack"},"about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"Immigration Law Software"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Legal Technology"}],"acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Often yes, though almost never from a published rate card. Among immigration-specific platforms, eImmigration by Cerenade is the one that puts a nonprofit term in writing on its own site: 50% off the standard monthly rate in exchange for an annual commitment, with schools and universities also qualifying, and no combining it with the annual-billing or per-user volume discounts, as of August 2026 [1][2]. Docketwise publishes per-user list prices with no nonprofit rate anywhere on that page, while LollyLaw and Mitratech's INSZoom publish no prices at all and route buyers to a demo [3][4][5]. Outside the immigration niche the break is usually structural rather than a percentage: LegalServer sells to civil legal aid by organization and gives pro bono attorneys and volunteers free access [6][7], and Salesforce donates 10 licenses to eligible nonprofits before any paid seat begins [10]. Because so little of this is published, ask every shortlisted vendor for its nonprofit rate, eligibility proof, term length, stacking rules, and renewal price in writing.","url":"https://www.answerstack.io/q/do-nonprofit-immigration-legal-aid-programs-get-discounts-on-case-management-software","upvoteCount":0,"datePublished":"2026-08-13T16:53:00","dateModified":"2026-08-13T00:00:00","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"AnswerStack Editorial Team","worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"AnswerStack"},"url":"https://www.answerstack.io/contributors/answer-stack"},"citation":[{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Pricing | eimmigration Law Software","url":"https://get.eimmigration.com/pricing"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Immigration Software for Non-Profits | eimmigration","url":"https://get.eimmigration.com/solutions/non-profits"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Docketwise Pricing | Powerful Immigration Software","url":"https://www.docketwise.com/pricing/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"LollyLaw: All-In-One Immigration Case Management Software","url":"https://lollylaw.com/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"INSZoom Immigration Case Management","url":"https://www.mitratech.com/products/inszoom/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Civil Legal Aid Case Management Software","url":"https://www.legalserver.org/civil-legal-aid/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"CMS Guide 3.0: LegalServer","url":"https://housingactionil.org/cms-guide-v3/comparison/legalserver/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Clio for Legal Aid","url":"https://www.clioforlegalaid.com/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Justiceserver | Legal Case Management Built for Nonprofit Legal Aid","url":"https://www.justiceserver.org/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Nonprofit Pricing | Salesforce","url":"https://www.salesforce.com/nonprofit/pricing/"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"2 CFR 200.403 Factors affecting allowability of costs","url":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-2/section-200.403"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Technology Initiative Grant Program","url":"https://www.lsc.gov/grants/technology-initiative-grant-program"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"45 CFR Part 1626 Restrictions on legal assistance to aliens","url":"https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/part-1626"},{"@type":"CreativeWork","name":"Legal Aid Tech Stack","url":"https://www.lsntap.org/tools-resources/legal-aid-tech-stack"}]}}}