Google's guide to generative AI features in Search says unique, first-hand content is likely to influence a site's presence in those features more than anything else in the guide. It contrasts that with content built on common knowledge.
Suppose the support-software team writes the backlog page. A common-knowledge version lists tips for working through tickets faster. A first-hand version opens with a direct answer: with volume flat, a backlog grows when fewer tickets are closed than arrive. That can come from tickets taking longer to resolve, or from less capacity to work them.
The page then gives the reasons the team has seen in its own customers' accounts, such as more reopened tickets, more handoffs between teams or unfilled shifts. It also says which report would separate one from another. A page like that gives the reader possible causes and a way to narrow them down, and it draws on evidence a summary of other articles wouldn't have.
Put the answer in the opening sentence and the explanation under it, so a reader who stops early still has something to use.