Reports show where visits came from. They can't show what an assistant says about you. For that, take the questions buyers ask before they buy and put them to each platform you're considering. Write down whether your company is named, whether your pages are linked and which other sources appear.
A sample tells you how you appear for those questions on the day you ran them. It can't tell you how many buyers asked them, so read it beside the visit and CRM numbers.
Lean Labs' AEO service is a documented example of the method. Its service page describes building the question set from HubSpot sales calls, CRM insights, Search Console demand and competitor prompts. It then lists prompt tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity. Two things make that useful as a model. The questions start from the client's own sales and search records, and the same set runs on several platforms, so the results can be compared.
Suppose your HubSpot report shows 140 sessions from ChatGPT last quarter, 30 from Perplexity and 4 from Claude. Six of the contacts created from those visits reached a sales conversation, and five of the six have ChatGPT as their recorded source. Search Console shows AI impressions on your pricing page and two comparison pages. When you run twenty buyer questions, your company is named in several ChatGPT answers and in none of Perplexity's.
Those inputs put ChatGPT first, because recorded visits and sales conversations already come from it. Google's Search features come second. The impressions show your links are being displayed there, and you'd want to learn which pages earn them. Perplexity is a gap to investigate, starting with whether its crawler can fetch your pages. Claude stays on the watch list until its numbers change.