The average is not enough capacity. Calls do not arrive evenly, so the number in progress swings above and below the average during the hour.
The Erlang B model accounts for those swings. You give it the busy-hour traffic and a blocking target, which is the share of calls you accept will find every path in use. Westbay calls 1 percent "a normal figure to use in traffic engineering" and says some applications use a looser 3 percent. Westbay's guide runs 17.5 erlangs and a 1 percent target through its Erlang B calculator and gets 27 lines. A line here means one voice path, the same thing a SIP provider calls a channel.
So the model sets 27 paths against an average of 17.5 calls. The extra paths are there for the moments when calls bunch up. The 1 percent is the model's prediction under its own assumptions. It is a planning input, and nobody has promised it to you as a service level.
Westbay attaches two cautions to the method. The first concerns where the traffic figure comes from. The model wants offered traffic, which is every call people attempted. Westbay warns that call loggers measure carried traffic, the calls that got through. Some systems also record attempts that failed, and where yours does, count them. Where it does not, a system that was already running at its ceiling shows less traffic than was offered to it, and a trunk sized from that log comes out too small.
The second caution is that random arrival is an assumption of the model. A sudden burst does not fit it. Westbay's example is the response to a radio or television advertisement, and it suggests building in extra capacity where you expect one. A storm has the same effect on a public agency's phones, which is the situation Atlantech's customer adds capacity for.